Detangling the Interrelationships Between Self-Regulation and Ill-Structured Problem Solving in Problem-Based Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
One of the goals for problem-based learning (PBL) is to promote self-regulation. Although self-regulation has been studied extensively, its interrelationships with ill-structured problem solving have been unclear. In order to clarify the interrelationships, this article proposes a conceptual framework illustrating the iterative processes among problem-solving stages (i.e., problem representation and solution generation) and self-regulation phases (i.e., planning, execution, and reflection). The dynamics of the interrelationships are further illustrated with three ill-structured problem-solving examples in different domains (i.e., information problem solving, historical inquiry, and science inquiry). The proposed framework contributes to research and practice by providing a new lens to examine self-regulation in ill-structured problem solving and offering guidelines to design effective tools and strategies to scaffold and assess PBL.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Argelagós, E., & Pifarré, M. (2012). Improving information problem solving skills in secondary education through embedded instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 515–526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.024
Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–486.
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 3–12.
Barrows, H. S. (2000). Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield: Southern Illinois University Press.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Bixler, B., & Land, S. (2010). Supporting college students’ ill-structured problem solving in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 39(1), 3–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/ET.39.1.b
Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1
Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(3), 487–508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.005
Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Walraven, A. (2009). A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1207–1217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.004
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–115). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bulu, S., & Pedersen, S. (2010). Scaffolding middle school students’ content knowledge and ill-structured problem solving in a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(5), 507–529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9150-9
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educa- tional Research, 65(3), 245–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
Chen, C.-H., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2007). The effect of web- based question prompts on scaffolding knowledge integration and ill-structured problem solving. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 359–375.
Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem-solving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information processing approach (pp. 227–250). New York: W. H. Freeman.
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1170558
Cho, K.-L., & Jonassen, D. (2002). The effects of argumen- tation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 5–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02505022
de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002179
Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
Elliot, A., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
Ge, X. (2013). Designing learning technology to support self-monitoring and self-regulation during ill-structured problem-solving tasks. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven, Inter- national handbook of metacognition and learning technolo- gies (pp. 213–228). New York: Springer.
Ge, X., & Land, S. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem- solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02504515
Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02504836
Ge, X., Law, V., & Huang, K. (2012). Diagnosis, supporting, and fading: A scaffolding design framework for adaptive e-learning systems. In H. Wang (Ed.), Interactivity in e-learning: Case studies and frameworks (pp. 116–162). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Ge, X., & Wang, Q. (2016, April). An investigation of group dynamics and group processes in interdisciplinary teams on an ill-structured problem solving project. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Greene, J. A., Bolick, C. M., & Robertson, J. (2010). Fostering historical knowledge and thinking skills using hypermedia learning environments: The role of self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 54(1), 230–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.006
Hannafin, M. J., Land, S. M., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 115–140). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Hong, Y.-C., & Choi, I. (2011). Three dimensions of reflective thinking in solving design problems: A conceptual model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 687–710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9202-9
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Deveopment, 45(1), 65–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0229 9613
Kitchner, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition. Human Development, 26(4), 222–232. Kitchner, K. S., & King, P. M. (1981). Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 89–116.
Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science 12, 1–48.
Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Meta- cognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 31–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kluwe, R. H., & Friedricksen, G. (1985). Mechanisms of control and regulation in problem solving. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 183–218). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Lai, M., & Law, N. (2006). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaborative groups with differential learning experiences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 123–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/GW42 -575W-Q301-1765
Land, S. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 61–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02319858
Lazonder, A. W., & Rouet, J.-F. (2008). Information problem solving instruction: Some cognitive and metacognitive issues. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 753–765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.025
Lee, H., Lim, K., & Grabowski, B. (2010). Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(6), 629–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9153-6
Loyens, S., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007 /s10648-008-9082-7
Lynch, C., Ashley, K. D., Pinkwart, N., & Aleven, V. (2009). Concepts, structures, and goals: Redefining ill- definedness. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 19(3), 253–266.
Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Panadero, E. (2015). Promoting socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Progress of socially shared regulation among high- and low-performing groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 562–572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.082
McCaslin, M. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 137–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832384
Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173–190.
Muis, K. R., & Franco, G. M. (2009). Epistemic beliefs: Setting the standards for self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(4), 306–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.005
Nelson, L. M. (1999). Collaborative problem solving. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 241–267). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., . . . Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2002). The effects of modeling expert cognitive strategies during problem-based learning. Jour- nal of Educational Computing Research, 26(4), 353–380.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167
Poitras, E. G., & Lajoie, S. P. (2013). A domain-specific account of self-regulated learning: The cognitive and metacognitive activities involved in learning through historical inquiry. Metacognition and Learning, 8(3), 213– 234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9104-9
Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1987). Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers, and policy makers. New York: HarperCollins.
Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students’ learning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 282–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.282
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.
Schmidt, H. G. (1989). The rationale behind problem-based learning. In H. G. Schmidt, M. Lipkin, M. W. de Vries, & J. M. Greep (Eds.), New directions for medical education: Problem-based learning and community-oriented medical education (pp. 105–111). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Schön, D. A. (1990). The design process. In V. A. Howard (Ed.), Varieties of thinking: Essays from Harvard’s philosophy of education center (pp. 110–141). New York: Routledge.
Sinnott, J. D. (1989). A model for solution of ill-structured problems: Implications for everyday and abstract problem solving. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and application (pp. 72–99). New York: Praeger.
Song, H.-D. (2005). Motivating ill-structured problem solving in a web-based peer-group learning environment: A learning-goal perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(4), 351–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/bepd-nd3h-cxn4-gr30
Stepich, D. A., & Ertmer, P. A. (2009). “Teaching” instructional design expertise: Strategies to support students’ problem-finding skills. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning, 7(2), 147–170.
Torp, L., & Sage, S. (2002). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K–16 education (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
van Joolingen, W. R., & de Jong, T. (1997). An extended dual search space model of scientific discovery learning. Instructional Science, 25(5), 307–346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1002993406499
Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
Voss, J. F., & Post, T. A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In M. T. H. Chi & R. Glaser (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 261–285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Voss, J. F., Wolfe, C. R., Lawrence, J. A., & Engle, R. A.(1991). From representation to decision: An analysis of problem solving in international relations. In R.J.Sternberg & P.A. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 119–158).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wallace, R. M., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 75–104.
Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2009). How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information. Computers & Education, 52(1), 234–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.003
Windschitl, M., & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 145–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199802)35:2<145::AID -TEA5>3.0.CO;2-S
Winne, P.H. (2015). What is the state of the art in self-, co- and socially shared regulation in CSCL? Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 628–631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.007
Wopereis, I., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Vermetten, Y. (2008). The effect of embedded instruction on solving information problems. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 738–752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.024
Wu, L., & Looi, C.-K. (2012). Agent prompts: Scaffolding for productive reflection in an intelligent learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 339–353.
Zhang, J., Chen, Q., Sun, Y., & Reid, D. J. (2004). Triple scheme of learning support design for scientific discovery learning based on computer simulation: Experimental research. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(4), 269–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00062.x
Zhou, M. (2013a). A systematic understanding of successful web searches in information-based tasks. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (1), 321–331.
Zhou, M. (2013b). Using traces to investigate self-regulatory activities: A study of self-regulation and achievement goal profiles in the context of web search for academic tasks. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(3), 287– 305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.12.3.287
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 217–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3004_8
Zimmerman, B. J., & Campillo, M. (2003). Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 233–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.