Developing My Perspectives on Scaffolding and Problem-Based Learning: A Retrospective View

Main Article Content

Brian R. Belland

Abstract

In this paper, I describe the iterative development of my perspectives on scaffolding and problem-based learning through interactions with other scholars and research. Such influences include doctoral experiences, funded projects, and exposures to research from a variety of traditions.

Article Details

Section
10th Anniversary Section: Past and Future

References

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813

Belland, B. R. (2008). Supporting middle school students’ construction of evidence-based arguments: Impact of and student interactions with computer-based argumentation scaffolds (PhD Dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text. (Publication Number 304502316)

Belland, B. R. (2010). Portraits of middle school students constructing evidence-based arguments during problem-based learning: The impact of computer-based scaffolds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(3), 285–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9139-4

Belland, B. R. (2011). Distributed cognition as a lens to understand the effects of scaffolds: The role of transfer of responsibility. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 577– 600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9176-5

Belland, B. R., Burdo, R., & Gu, J. (2015). A blended professional development program to help a teacher learn to provide one-to-one scaffolding. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 263–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9419-2

Belland, B. R., & Drake, J. (2013). Toward a framework on how affordances and motives can drive different uses of computer-based scaffolds: Theory, evidence, and design implications. Educational Technology Research & Development, 61, 903–925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013 -9313-6

Belland, B. R., Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Perceptions of the value of problem-based learning among students with special needs and their teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(2), 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1024

Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2009). Inclusion and problem-based learning: Roles of students in a mixed-ability group. Research on Middle Level Education, 32(9), 1–19.

Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2008). A scaffolding framework to support the construction of evidence-based arguments among middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 401–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9074-1

Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2011). Problem-based learning and argumentation: Testing a scaffolding framework to support middle school students’ creation of evidence-based arguments. Instructional Science, 39, 667–694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9148-z

Belland, B. R., Gu, J., Armbrust, S., & Cook, B. (2015). Scaffolding argumentation about water quality: A mixed method study in a rural middle school. Educational Technology Research & Development, 63(3), 325–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9373-x

Belland, B. R., Gu, J., Kim, N. J., & Turner, D. J. (In Press). An ethnomethodological perspective on how middle school students addressed a water quality problem. Educational Technology Research & Development (2016), 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9451-8

Belland, B. R., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. (2013). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48, 243–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.838920

Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N., & Lefler, M. (Under review). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis.

Bereby-Meyer, Y., & Kaplan, A. (2005). Motivational influences on transfer of problem-solving strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.06.003

Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student-centered learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(4), 333–356.

Clark, D. B., Touchman, S., Martinez-Garza, M., Ramirez-Marin, F., & Skjerping Drews, T. (2012). Bilingual language supports in online science inquiry environments. Computers & Education, 58, 1207–1224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.019

Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage.

Dabbagh, N., & Dass, S. (2013). Case problems for problem-based pedagogical approaches: A comparative analysis. Computers & Education, 64, 161–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.007

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A

Englert, C. S. (1984). Effective direct instruction practices in special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 5(2), 38–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074193258400500208

Fee, S. B., & Belland, B. R. (2012). Understanding criticism and problem-based learning: An introduction. In S. B. Fee & B. R. Belland (Eds.), The role of criticism in understanding problem solving: Honoring the work of John C. Belland (pp. 1–10). New York: Springer.

Fyrenius, A., Bergdahl, B., & Silén, C. (2005). Lectures in problem-based learning—Why, when and how? An example of interactive lecturing that stimulates meaningful learning. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 61–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590400016365

Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02504515

Gersten, R. (1985). Direct instruction with special education students: A review of evaluation research. Journal of Special Education, 19(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002246698501900104

Glassner, A., Weinstock, M., & Neuman, Y. (2005). Pupils’ evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 105–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709904X22278

Greene, B. A., & Land, S. M. (2000). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource-based learning environment involving the world wide web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 151–179.

Heward, W. L. (2003). Ten faulty notions about teaching and learning that hinder the effectiveness of special education. Journal of Special Education, 36(4), 186–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002246690303600401

Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students’ and scientists’ reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 663–687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.1025

Hung, W. (2006). The 3C3R model: A conceptual framework for designing problems in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 55–77.

Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 588–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019682

Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 362– 381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782391

Jonassen, D. H. (2011a). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York: Routledge.

Jonassen, D. H. (2011b). Supporting problem solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 95–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1256

Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lather, P. (1992). Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post-structural perspectives. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 87–99.

Lekalakala-Mokgele, E. (2010). Facilitation in problem-based learning: Experiencing the locus of control. Nurse Education Today, 30(7), 638–642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.12.017

Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Pihlajamäki, H., & Kotkas, T. (2003). What makes a student group successful? Student-student and student-teacher interaction in a problem-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 6, 59–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022963826128

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Middleton, M. J., Ciani, K. D., Easter, M. A., O’Keefe, P. A., & Zusho, A. (2012). The strength of the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goal orientations: Theoretical, methodological, and instructional implications. Educational Psychologist, 47, 281–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722515

Lohman, M. C., & Finkelstein, M. (2000). Designing groups in problem-based learning to promote problem-solving skill and self-directedness. Instructional Science, 28, 291–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003927228005

Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 411–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7

Macklin, A. S., & Fosmire, M. (2004). A blueprint for progress. Resource Sharing & Information Networks, 17(1–2), 43–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J121v17n01_05

McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Synergy between teacher practices and curricular scaffolds to support students in using domain-specific and domain-general knowledge in writing arguments to explain phenomena. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 416–460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508400903013488

McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 153–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1

Metcalf, S. J. (1999). The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments (PhD Dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text. (Publication Number 9959821)

Nariman, N., & Chrispeels, J. (2015). PBL in the era of reform standards: Challenges and benefits perceived by teachers in one elementary school. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1521

Oliver, K., & Hannafin, M. J. (2000). Student management of web-based hypermedia resources during open-ended problem solving. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 75–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598746

Parsons, S. A., & Ward, A. E. (2011). The case for authentic tasks in content literacy. Reading Teacher, 64, 462–465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.6.12

Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 185–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20048

Raes, A., Schellens, T., DeWever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 59, 82–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.010

Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159– 175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990

Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12, 529–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00030-5

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02505026

Schmidt, H. G., Machiels-Bongaerts, M., Hermans, H., ten Cate, T. J., Venekamp, R., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1996). The development of diagnostic competence: Comparison of a problem-based, and integrated, and a conventional medical curriculum. Academic Medicine, 71, 658–664.

Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 344–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221949803100404

Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 305–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_3

Tan, O.-S. (2003). Problem-based learning innovation: Using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia.

van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6

Walton, J. (2014). Teachers as expert learners and fellow travelers: A review of professional development practices for problem-based learning. Issues in Teacher Education, 23(2), 67.

Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001

Willems, P., & Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R. (2012). School— community partnerships: Using authentic contexts to academically motivate students. School Community Journal, 22(2), 9–30.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x