Another Piece of the “Silence in PBL” Puzzle: Students’ Explanations of Dominance and Quietness as Complementary Group Roles
Main Article Content
Abstract
A problem-based learning (PBL) assumption is that silence is incompatible with collaborative learning. Although sociocultural studies have reinterpreted silence as collaborative, we must understand how silence occurs in PBL groups. This essay presents students’ explanations of dominance, leadership, and silence as PBL group roles. An ethnographic investigation of PBL groups, informed by social constructionism, was conducted at two dental schools (in Australia and Ireland). The methods used were observation, interviews, and focus groups. The participants were volunteer first-year undergraduates. Students attributed dominance, silence, and members’ group roles to personal attributes. Consequently, they assumed that groups divided naturally into dominant leaders and silent followers. Sometimes silence had a collaborative learning function, but it was also due to social exclusion. This assumption enabled social practices that privileged some group members and marginalized others. Power and participation in decision making in PBL groups was restricted to dominant group members.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Barrows, H. S. (1988). The tutorial process. Springfield: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Benbow, E. W., & McMahon, R. F. T. (2001). Mature students? In P. Schwartz, S. Mennin & G. Webb (Eds), Problem-based learning: Case studies, experience and practice (pp. 119–125). London: Kogan Page.
Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Carter, S., & Little, M. (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1316–1328. doi:10.1177/1049732307306927
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509– 536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; Merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 623–630.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Den- zin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., de Grave, W. S., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2005). Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39(7), 732–741.
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (1998). Motivational and cognitive processes influencing tutorial groups. Academic Medicine, 73(10), S22–S24.
Duek, J. (2000). Whose group is it, anyway? Equity of student discourse in problem-based learning (PBL). In C. E. Hmelo & D. H. Evensen (Eds.) Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 75–108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Faidley, J., Evensen, D. H., Salisbury-Glennon, J., Glenn, J., & Hmelo, C. E. (2000). How are we doing? Methods of assessing group processing in a problem-based learning context. In C. E. Hmelo & D. H Evensen (Eds.), Problem- based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 109–138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hendry, G. D., Ryan, G., & Harris, J. (2003). Group problems in problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 25(6), 609–615.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004) Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Houlden, R. L., Collier, C. P., Frid, P. J., John, S. L., & Pross, H. (2001). Problems identified by tutors in a hybrid problem-based learning curriculum. Academic Medicine, 76(1), 81.
Imafuku, R. (2012). Japanese first-year students’ learning processes: A classroom discourse analysis. In S. Bridges, C. McGrath, & T. Whitehill, (Eds.) Problem-based learn- ing in clinical education: The next generation, pp. 153–170. Series title: Innovations and Change in Professional Education (ICPE 8). Dordrecht: Springer.
Imafuku, R., Kataoka, R., Mayahara, M., Suzuki, H., & Saiki, T. (2014). Students’ experiences in interdisciplinary problem-based learning: A discourse analysis of group interaction. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(2). doi: 10.7771/1541-5015-1388.
Jin, J. (2012). Sounds of silence: Examining silence in problem-based learning (PBL) in Asia. In S. Bridges, C. McGrath, & T. Whitehill, (Eds.) Problem-based learning in clinical education: The next generation, pp. 171–188. Series title: Innovations and Change in Professional Education (ICPE 8). Dordrecht: Springer.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, F. P. (2009). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kwan, A. (2009). Problem-based learning. In M. Tight, K. H. Mok, J. Huisman, & C. C. Morphew (Eds.). The Routledge international handbook of higher education (pp. 91–107). New York and Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Liamputtong, P. (2013). Qualitative research methods (4th ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Nieminen, J., Sauri, P., & Lonka, K. (2006). On the relationship between group functioning and study success in problem-based learning. Medical Education, 40(1), 64–71.
Palmer, B., & Major, C. H. (2004). Learning leadership through collaboration: The intersection of leadership and group dynamics in problem-based learning. In M. Savin- Baden & K. Wilkie (Eds.). Challenging research in problem-based learning (pp. 120–132). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation meth- ods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Remedios, L., Clarke, D. & Hawthorne, L. (2008a). Framing collaborative behaviors: Listening and speaking in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(1), 1–20.
Remedios, L., Clarke, D., & Hawthorne, L. (2008b). The silent participant in small group collaborative learning contexts. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 201–216.
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 135(5), 31–38.
Skinner, V. J., Braunack-Mayer, A., & Winning, T. A. (2012). Getting on with each other: PBL group dynamics and function. In S. Bridges, C. McGrath, & T. Whitehill (Eds.). Problem-based Learning in clinical education: The next generation, pp. 189–205. Series title: Innovations and Change in Professional Education (ICPE 8). Dordrecht: Springer.
Skinner, V. J., Braunack-Mayer, A., & Winning, T. A. (2015). The purpose and value for students of PBL groups for learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 9(1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1499
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43–69.
Tipping, R. F., Freeman, R. F., & Rachlis, A. R. (1995). Using faculty and student perceptions of group dynamics to develop recommendations for PBL training. Academic Medicine, 70(11), 1050–1052.
Virtanen, P. J., Kosunen, E. A.-L., Holmberg-Marttila, D. M. H., & Virjo, I. O. (1999). What happens in PBL tutorial sessions? Analysis of medical student’ written accounts. Medical Teacher, 21(3), 270–276.
Willis, S. C., Jones, A., Bundy, C., Burdett, K., Whitehouse, C. R., & O’Neill, P. A. (2002). Small-group work and assessment in a PBL curriculum: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation of student perceptions of the process of working in small groups and its assessment. Medical Teacher, 24(5), 495–501.