All PBL Starts Here: The Problem
Main Article Content
Abstract
One essential piece of implementing of PBL is the problem. There have been calls from practitioners in the PBL field for a systematic process for designing effective PBL problems. Yet, the research efforts to explore, develop, and test PBL problem design methods or processes are still sparse. From an instructional designer and researcher’s perspective, I deem problem design to be the first step to ensure not only the proper affordance of the learning goal but also the students’ overall learning process in PBL implementation. PBL problem design is the area I have studied most consistently and passionately. In this paper, I share my continuing study of PBL problem design, from the original 3C3R model and the 9-step design process, to an examination of the cognitive components of PBL problems such as problem difficulty structure and levels, to my recent focus on the affective components of PBL problems.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Ak, S., Hung, W., & Holen, J. B. (2012, April). Problems and motivation in Problem-based Learning: A case study. Paper presented at AERA Annual Meeting 2012, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68, 52–81.
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. In L. Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bring problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 68, 3–12.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer. Bassok, M. (2003). Analogical transfer in problem solving. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 343–369). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1984). The IDEAL problem solver. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. The Educational Psychologist, 26, 325–346.
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., & Snellen-Balendong, H. (1997). Seven principles of effective case design for a problem-based curriculum. Medical Teacher, 19(3), 185–189.
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Wijnen, W. H. F. W. (2001). Solving problems with group work in problem-based learning: Hold on to the philosophy. Medical Education, 35, 884–889.
Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J. (1995). Definitions, traditions, and a general framework for understanding complex problem solving. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75, 27–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001027
Glew, R. H. (2003). The problem with problem-based medical education: Promises not kept. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 31(1), 52–56.
Goodnough, K., & Hung, W. (2008). Designing effective problems: Evaluation of 3C3R 9-step design process. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 2(2), 61–90.
Goodnough, K., & Hung, W. (2009). Enhancing teacher pedagogical content knowledge in the context of elementary science. Teaching Education, 20(3), 229–242.
Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral & Brain Science, 21, 803–864.
Hays, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1974). Understanding written problem instructions. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.), Knowledge and cognition (pp. 167–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hung, W. (2006). The 3C3R model: A conceptual framework for designing problems in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 55–77.
Hung, W. (2009). The 9-step process for designing PBL problems: Application of the 3C3R model. Educational Research Review, 4(2), 118–141.
Hung, W. (2011). Theory to reality: A few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 59, 118–141.
Hung, W., Ak, S., & Holen, J. (2013, April). A cross-cultural study of problems elements and motivation in PBL: A comparison of US and Turkish pre-service teachers. Paper presented at AERA Annual Meeting 2013, San Francisco, CA.
Hung, W., & Holen, J. B. (2011). Problem-based learning: Preparing pre-service teachers for real world classroom challenges. ERS Spectrum, 29(3), 29–48.
Hung, W., Love, S., & Fu, H. (2012, April). Enhancing learning effectiveness in problem-based learning: Can problem design help? Paper presented at AERA Annual Meeting 2012, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Hung, W., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2012). Global development of problem-based learning: Adoption, adaptation, and advancement. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 6(1), 4–9.
Hung, W., Mehl, K., & Holen, J. B. (2013). The relationships between problem design and learning process in problem-based learning environments: Two cases. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 635–645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0066-0
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well- structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. ETR&D, 45(1), 65–94.
Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2008). All problems are not equal: Implications for PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(2), 6–28.
Kalaian, H. A., Mullan, P. B., & Kasim, R. M. (1999). What can studies of problem-based learning tell us? Synthesizing and modeling PBL effects on National Board of Medical Examination performance: Hierarchical linear modeling meta-analytic approach. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 4, 209–221.
Kolodner, J. L. (2002). Analogical and case-based reasoning: Their implications for education. The Journal of the Learning Science, 11(1), 123–126.
Kotovsky, K., Hays, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1985). Why are some problems hard: Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 248–294.
Loyens, S. M. M., Kirschner, P., & Paas, F. (2011). Problem- based learning. In S. Graham (Editor-in-Chief), A. Bus, S. Major, & L. Swanson (Associate Editors), APA educa- tional psychology handbook: Vol. 3. Application to learning and teaching. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Moust, J. H. C., van Berkel, H. J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2005). Signs of erosion: Reflections on three decades of problem- based learning at Maastricht University. Higher Education, 50, 665–683.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67, 557–565.
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Quesada, J., Kintsch, W., & Gomez, E. (2005). Complex problem-solving: A field in search of definition? Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(1), 5–33.
Romito, L. M., & Eckert, G. J. (2011). Relationship of biomedical science content acquisition performance to students’ level of PBL group interaction: Are students learning during PBL group? Journal of Dental Education, 75(5), 653–664.
Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17, 11–16.
Spering, M., Wagener, D., & Funke, J. (2005). Brief report: The role of emotions in complex problem-solving. Cognition and Emotion, 19(8), 1252–1261.
Sugrue, B. (1995). A theory-based framework for assessing domain-specific problem-solving ability. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(3), 32–35.
Tawfik, A. A., Trueman, R. J., Lorz, M. M., (2013). Design a PBL environment using the 3C3R method. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 4(1), 11–24.
Torp, L., & Sage, S. (1998). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K–12 education. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wood, P. K. (1983). Inquiring systems and problem structure: Implications for cognitive development. Human Development, 26, 249–265.
Wood, P. K. (1985). A statistical examination of necessary but not sufficient antecedents of problem solving behavior. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Xue, H., Qian J., Wang L., Yuan X., Chen Y., Wu W., Chen Y., & Sun K. (2013). 3C3R modified PBL pediatric teaching of Chinese medical students. PLOS ONE, 8(5), 1–9.