The Impact of Transdisciplinary Threshold Concepts on Student Engagement in Problem-Based Learning: A Conceptual Synthesis
Main Article Content
Abstract
There has been much recent discussion about student engagement in higher education, and in the last few years a number of authors have undertaken extensive international research on the topic, which has been summarized in a number of literature reviews. However, to date, there has been relatively little in-depth exploration of student engagement in problem-based learning (PBL) or the impact of different forms of engagement on distinct forms of PBL. Drawing on a number of studies over the last 15 years, this paper argues that student engagement in PBL can be troublesome as both a concept and a practice. It also suggests there are 4 transdisciplinary threshold concepts that have an impact on student engagement with PBL: liminality, scaffolding, pedagogical content knowledge, and pedagogical stance. The paper argues that by acknowledging these transdisciplinary threshold concepts and working with them, facilitators will be able to enhance student learning in PBL across disciplines, contexts, and diverse forms of PBL.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the university in an age of super-complexity. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Barnett, R. (2014). Conditions of flexibility. York, UK: Higher Education Academy.
Barrett, T. (2008). Students’ talk about problem-based learning in liminal spaces (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Barrett, T. (2010). The problem-based learning process as finding and being in flow. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2), 163–174.
Beaumont, C., Savin-Baden, M., Conradi, E., & Poulton, T. (2014). Evaluating a Second Life problem-based learning (PBL) demonstrator project: What can we learn? Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1), 125–141.
Belland, B. R., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2013). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational psychologist, 48(4), 243–270.
*Bernstein, B. (1972). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control (47–69). London: Collier-Macmillan.
Bernstein, B. (1992, November 11). Pedagogic identities and educational reform. Paper given to CEPAL conference. Santiago, Chile, mimeo.
Boughey, C. (2008). Texts, practices and students learning: A view from the South. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 192–199.
Buckingham, D., Burn, A., Parry, B., & Powell, M. (2014). Developing media literacy: Culture, creativity and critique. London: Routledge.
Burbules, N. C. (1997). Aporia: Webs, passages, getting lost, and learning to go on. Philosophy of Education. S. Laird (Ed.). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society, 33–43.
Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014). The architecture of productive learning networks. New York: Routledge.
Chandler, Q. (2015). Conversations beyond the threshold: An exploration of theological reflection among lay ministry students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Chen, D. (2015) Developing critical thinking through problem-based learning: An action research for a class of media literacy. (Doctoral dissertation). Durham University, Durham, UK.
Chen, D., & Rattray, J. (2016, forthcoming). Transforming thinking through problem-based learning in the news media literacy class: Critical thinking as a threshold concept towards threshold capabilities. Practice and evidence of the scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education.
Conradi, E., Kavia, S., Burden, D., Rice, D., Woodham, L., Beaumont, C., Savin-Baden, M., & Poulton, T. (2009). Virtual patients in virtual world: Training paramedic students. Medical Teacher, 31(8), 713–720.
Davies, P. (2006). Threshold concepts. How can we recog- nize them? In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (70–84). Abingdon, UK: Routledge Falmer.
Doody, J. (2009). A longitudinal evaluation of the impact of a problem-based learning approach to the teaching of software development in higher education (Doctoral dissertation). Durham University, Durham, UK. Retrieved from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/47/1/James_Doody_Ed.D._Thesis_1_Dec_09..pdf?DDD29
Entwistle, N. (2006, September). Threshold concepts and transformative ways of thinking in research into higher education. Presentation at the Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines Symposium. Glasgow. Video retrieved from http://video.strath.ac.uk/06/140-06-02.wvx
Fredholm, A., Savin-Baden, M., Henningsohn, L., & Silén, C. (2015). Autonomy as both challenge and development in clinical education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 5(6), 20–27.
Good, J., Howland, K., & Thackray, L. (2008). Problem-based learning spanning real and virtual words: A case study in Second Life. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 16(3), 163–172.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Hockings, C., Cooke, S., Yamashita, H., McGinty, S., & Bowl, M. (2008). Switched off ? A study on disengagement among computing students at two universities. Research Papers in Education, 23(2), 191–201.
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
Jacobsen, D. Y. (1997). Tutorial processes in a problem-based learning context; Medical students reception and negotiations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Jacobsen, D. (2004). The influence of participants’ reception of problem-based learning on problem-based learning tutorials. In M. Savin-Baden & K. Wilkie (Eds.), Challenging research in problem-based learning, 81–91. Maidenhead, UK: SRHE/Open University Press.
Jenkins, A., & Zetter, R. (2007). Linking teaching and research in departments. York, UK: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/linking-teaching-and-research-disciplines-and-departments-summary
Kinchin, I., Cabot, L. B., & Hay, D. B. (2010). Visualising expertise: Revealing the nature of a threshold concept in the development of an authentic pedagogy for clinical education. In: J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land, & C. Baillie. (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (81–95). Rotterdam, Sense Publishers.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions and recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(5) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Land, R. (2014, July 9–11). Liminality close-up. Think piece for Higher Education Close Up (HECU) 7, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. Fifth International Biennial Threshold Concepts Conference, Threshold Concepts in Practice, Durham University, Durham, UK. Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/events/hecu7/docs/ThinkPieces/land.pdf
Major, C., & Major, C. (2013). The relationship between learning context on student perceptions of problem-based learning: An examination of a marketing course project at a two-year institution. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. 37(8), 620–628.
Major, C., & Savin-Baden, M. (2010). An introduction to qualitative research synthesis managing the information explosion in social science research. London: Routledge.
McWilliam, E. L. (2005). Unlearning pedagogy. Journal of Learning Design, 1(1), 1–11. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising. In C. Rust (ed.), Improving student learning—Theory and practice ten years on (pp. 412–424). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development (OCSLD).
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–389.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: An introduction. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowl- edge (pp. 3–18). London and New York: Routledge.
Orsini-Jones, M. (2008). Troublesome language knowledge: Identifying ‘threshold concepts’ in grammar learning. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith. (Eds.), Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 213–226.
Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In J. H. F. Meyer and R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and trouble- some knowledge. Abingdon, UK: Routledge Falmer, 33–48.
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development during the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Porter, S. (2006). Institutional structures and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 47(5), 531–558.
Rattray, J. (2014, July 9–11). Mediating liminality: Artefacts as a means of supporting threshold transformations. Fifth International Biennial Threshold Concepts Conference, Threshold Concepts in Practice, Durham University, Durham, UK. Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/events/hecu7/papers/rattray%20.pdf
Rogers, C. (1983). Freedom to learn. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ross, J. (2011). Unmasking online reflective practices in higher education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh.
Sadlo, G., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of the academic environment in students following problem-based and subject-based curricula. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(3), 253–274.
Säljö, R. (1979). Learning in the learner’s perspective. 1. Some common-sense conceptions (Report 76). Gothenburg, SE: University of Gothenburg, Department of Education.
Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Problem-based learning in higher education: Untold stories. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press/SRHE.
Savin-Baden, M. (2003). Facilitating problem-based learning: Illuminating perspectives. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press/SRHE.
Savin-Baden, M. (2006). Disjunction as a form of troublesome knowledge in problem-based learning. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (160–172). London: Routledge.
*Savin-Baden, M. (2008a). Learning Spaces: Creating Opportunities for Knowledge Creation in Academic Life. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.
Savin-Baden, M. (2008b). Liquid learning and troublesome spaces: Journeys from the Threshold? In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (75–90). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Savin-Baden, M., (2014). Problem-based learning: New constellations for the 21st Century. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3/4) 197–219.
Savin-Baden, M. (2015). Rethinking learning in an age of digital fluency. Is being digitally tethered a new learning nexus? London: Routledge.
Savin-Baden, M., & Falconer, L. (2016, forthcoming). Learning at the interstices; Locating practical philosophies for understanding physical/virtual interspaces. In Interactive Learning Environments.
Savin-Baden, M., Poulton, T., Beaumont, C., & Conradi, E. (2016, forthcoming). What is real? Using problem-based learning in virtual worlds. In S. Bridges, L. K. Chan, & C. E. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), Educational technologies in medical and health sciences. New York: Springer.
Savin-Baden, M., Tombs, C., Poulton, T., Conradi, E., Kavia, S., Burden, D., & Beaumont, C. (2011). An evaluation of implementing problem-based learning scenarios in an immersive virtual world. International Journal of Medical Education, 2(2), 116–124.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Silén, C. (2000). Between chaos and cosmos—About responsibility and independence in learning (Doctoral dissertation). Linköping University, Linköping, SE.
Silén, C. (2004). Is it possible that PBL make students go meta? In M. Savin-Baden & K. Wilkie (Eds.), Challenging research in problem-based learning (144–156). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
Trafford, V. (2008). Conceptual frameworks as a threshold concept in doctorateness. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith Threshold concepts within the disciplines. Rotterdam, NL: Sense.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57–70.
Trowler, P. (2012). Theorising disciplines and research practices: Conceptual groundwork. In P. Trowler, M. Saunders, & V. Bamber (Eds.), Tribes and territories in the 21st-century: Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education. London: Routledge, 91–96.
Trowler, V., & Trowler. P. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/evidencenet/Student_engagement_literature_review
Trubshaw, B. (2003). The metaphors and rituals of place and time—An introduction to liminality or why Christopher Robin wouldn’t walk on the cracks [Essay]. First published in Mercian Mysteries, no. 22, February 1995. Retrieved from http://www.indigogroup.co.uk/edge/liminal.htm.
Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. London: Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1930). Wilkie, K. (2004). Becoming facilitative: Shifts in lecturers’ approaches to facilitating problem-based learning. In M. Savin-Baden & K. Wilkie (Eds.), Challenging research in problem-based learning (81–91). Maidenhead, UK: SRHE/ Open University Press.
Wimpenny, K., & Savin-Baden, M. (2013). Alienation, agency and authenticity: A synthesis of practice and effects in student engagement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 311–326.
Wisker, G., & Kiley, M. (2008). Learning to be a researcher: The concepts and crossings. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, and J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (399–414). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Wisker, G., Kiley, M., & Aiston, S. (2006). Making the learning leap: Research students crossing conceptual thresholds. In M. Kiley & G. Mullins (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate research: Knowledge creation in testing times. Canberra: The Australian National University, 195–201.
Wisker, G., Robinson, G., & Kiley, M. (2008). Crossing liminal spaces: Encouraging postgraduate students to cross conceptual thresholds and achieve threshold concepts in their research. In M. Kiley & G. Mullins (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate research: Research education in the new global environment—Part 2: Conference proceedings. Canberra: CEDAM, ANU.
Yew, E. H. J., & Yong, J. J. Y. (2014). Student perceptions of facilitators’ social congruence, use of expertise and cognitive congruence in problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 42(5), 795–815.
Zepke, N. (2013). Threshold concepts and student engagement: Revisiting pedagogical content knowledge. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(2), 97–107.
Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167–177.
Zyngier, D. (2007). Listening to teachers-listening to students: Substantive conversations about resistance, empowerment and engagement. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(4), 327–347.