Producing an Online Undergraduate Literary Magazine: A Guide to Using Problem-Based Learning in the Writing and Publishing Classroom
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article will illustrate how a problem-based learning (PBL) course (Savery, 2006) can be used in a writing program as a vehicle for both creative and preprofessional learning. English 420: Writing, Publishing, and Editing is offered every fall, and its counterpart, English 423: Writing, Publishing, and Editing is offered each spring. The courses, positioned at the end of a sequenced series of prerequisite writing courses, provide a creative, applied writing experience that offers students professional practice through producing the digital version of Cabrini College’s literary magazine, Woodcrest. In the 2012–2013 school year, the English Department ran its first cycle of this model, which, at the time of this writing, is in its third year. Three successive Gold Medal ratings of our online literary magazine (2012–2013, 2013–2014, 2014–2015) by the Columbia Scholastic Press Association (CSPA) and a Gold Crown Award (2013–2014) suggest that problem-based learning, when used to cultivate an authentic online literary publication, familiarizes students with the life cycle of creative projects and enhances their writing. Writing students benefit from experiencing the interdisciplinary, collaborative, and student-driven work that problem-based learning prioritizes. This article will provide many resources to illustrate how PBL can be used when transitioning a literary magazine from print to online in a class-based setting.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Cennamo, K., Brandt, C., Scott, B., Douglas, S., McGrath, M., Reimer, Y., & Vernon, M. (2011). Managing the complexity of design problems through studio-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 12–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1253
Chettiparamb, A. (2007). Interdisciplinarity: A literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 1–63. Retrieved from www.llas.ac.uk/resourcedownloads
Davidson, N., & Major, C. H. (2014). Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3 & 4), 7–55.
DeBlasis, A. (2006). From revolution to evolution: Making the transition from community service learning to community-based research. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18, 36–42. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE48.pdf
Dunlap, J. C. (2006). The effect of a problem-centered, enculturating experience on doctoral students’ self-efficacy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(2), 19–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1025
English, M. C., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem- and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2). 128–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541 -5015.1339
Grant, M. M. (2002, Winter). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and recommendations. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 5. Retrieved from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/win2002/514/index.html
Hanney, R. (2013). Towards a situated media practice: Reflections on the implementation of project-led problem-based learning. Journal of Media Practice, 14(1), 43–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.14.1.43_1
Hanney, R., & Savin-Baden, M. (2013). The problem of projects: Understanding the theoretical underpinnings of project-led PBL. London Review of Education, 11(1), 7–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2012.761816
Herther, N. K. (2011). eBooks everywhere. Searcher, 19(6), 22–31.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 21–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1004
Lee, J. S., Blackwell, S., Drake, J., & Moran, K. A. (2014). Taking a leap of faith: Redefining teaching and learning in higher education through project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(2), 19–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1426
Pennington, M. (2013). Evolutionary trends in writing pedagogy: An early 21st century view. Writing & Pedagogy, 5(1). Retrieved 16 December, 2014, Retrieved from http://www.equinoxpub.com/journals/index.php/WAP/article/view/17484
Riordan, T. (2005). Education for the 21st century: Teaching, learning, and assessment. Change, 37(1), 52–56.
Rosinski, P., & Peeples, T. (2012). Forging rhetorical subjects: Problem-based learning in the writing classroom. Composition Studies, 40(2), 9–33.
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learn- ing: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Savin-Baden, M. (2014). Using problem-based learning: New constellations for the 21st century. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 197–219.
Sockalingam, N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Characteristics of problems for problem-based learning: The students’ perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(1), 6–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1135
Tucker, Patrick (2008). The 21st century writer. The Futurist, 42(4). Retrieved from http://www.wfs.org/May-June%20files/Futwrite1.htm
Turns, J., Cuddihy, E., & Guan, Z. (2010). I thought this was going to be a waste of time: How portfolio construction can support student learning from project-based experiences. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 4(2), 63–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1125
Weld, J., & Trainer, J. (2007). A faculty interdisciplinary institute as liberator from stifling disciplinary mythology. College Teaching, 55(4), 157–163.
West, R. E., Williams, G. S., & Williams, D. D. (2013). Improving problem-based learning in creative communi- ties through effective group evaluation. Interdisciplinary Journal Of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 1–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1394