PBL in the Era of Reform Standards: Challenges and Benefits Perceived by Teachers in One Elementary School
Main Article Content
Abstract
We explore teachers’ efforts to implement problem-based learning (PBL) in an elementary school serving predominantly English learners. Teachers had an opportunity to implement the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) using PBL in a summer school setting with no test-pressures. To understand the challenges and benefits of PBL implementation, a case study method was used and a variety of data collected. Results suggest collaboration amongst teachers is essential to design and implement PBL units. A challenge was the tension between the contradictory accountability and curriculum coverage goals of the regular academic year versus letting go to promote inquiry. Both teachers and students valued working in collaborative teams. An important insight is the need to help teachers connect NGSS to students’ lives and to consider their background knowledge in unit development and problem formulation.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Ansberry, K. R., & Morgan, E. R. (2007). More picture-perfect science lessons: Using children’s books to guide inquiry, K-4. Arlington, VA: NSTA.
Ansberry, K. R., & Morgan, E. R. (2005). Picture-perfect science lessons: Using children’s books to guide inquiry, Grades 3–6. Arlington, VA: NSTA.
Aronson, E. N., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Azer, S. A. (2009). Problem-based learning in the fifth, sixth, and seventh grades: Assessment of students’ perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1033–1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.023
Barell, J. (2010). Problem-based learning: The foundation for 21st century skills. In J. Belanca & R. Brandt (Eds.). 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 175–201). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. In L. Wilkerson & H. Gilselaers (Eds.). Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966804
Barton, A. C. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 379–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199804)35:4<379::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-N
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Bransford, J. D., Vye, N., Stevens, R., Kuhl, P., Schwartz, D., Bell, P., . . . Sabelli, N. (2006). Learning theories and education: Toward a decade of synergy. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.). Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 209–244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brinkerhoff, J., & Glazewski, K. (2004). Support of expert and novice teachers within a technology enhanced problem-based learning unit: A case study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Learning Technology, 1, 219–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2004.004877
Burke, P. H. (2011). Inquiry designs for deep learning. Workshop conducted El Cajon, CA.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing groupwork (2nd ed.). New York: Teacher College Press.
Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 337–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20053
De Corte, E. (2010). Historical development in the understanding of learning. In H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Eds.). The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (pp. 35–67). Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264086487-4-en
Delisle, R. (1997). How to use problem-based learning in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van Den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13, 533-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7
Dotson, J. (2001). Cooperative learning structures can increase student achievement. Kagan Online Magazine. Retrieved from www.Kaganonline.com
Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education. In B. Duch, S. Groh, & D. Allen (Eds.). The power of problem-based learning. (pp. 3–11). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: Supporting the efforts of K-12 teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 40–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1005
Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Fowler, A. (1995). How to build effective teams. People Management, 1(4), 40–41.
Fullan, M. (2013). Stratosphere: Integrating technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge. Don Mills, ON: Pearson.
Fulwiler, B. R. (2007). Writing in science: How to scaffold instruction to support learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Gallagher, S. A., & Gallagher, J. J. (2013). Using problem- based learning to explore unseen academic potential. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 7(1), 111–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1322
Gentry, J. W. (1980). Group size and attitudes toward the simulation experience. Simulation & Games, 11i(4), 451– 459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104687818001100405
González, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (1995). Introduction: Theorizing practices. In N. González, L. Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms (pp. 1–24). New York: Routledge.
Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and recommendations. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 5(1). Retrieved from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/win2002/514/
Haberyan, A. (2007). Team-based learning in an industrial psychology course. North American Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 143–152.
Hall, L. (1989). The effect of cooperative learning on achievement: A meta-analysis. Dissertation Abstract International, 50, 343A.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
Hernandez, S. A. (2002). Team learning in a marketing principles course: Cooperative structures that facilitate active learning and higher level thinking. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 73–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0273475302241009
Heusman, S., & Moenich, D. (2003). Achievement still on the rise at Catalina Ventura School. Kagan Online Magazine. Retrieved from www.Kaganonline.com
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Hung, W. (2011). Theory to reality: A few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 529–552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9198-1
Ingham, A. G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringelman effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Psychology, 10, 371–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(74)90033-X
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Books.
Johnson, C. C., Zhang, D., & Kahle, J. B. (2012). Effective science instruction: Impact on high-stakes assessment performance. Online Research in Middle Level Education (RMLE), 35(9), 1–14.
Kagan, S. (1994). Kagan cooperative learning (2nd ed.). San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing.
Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 921–946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20080
Mahiri, K. (2005). From 3 R’s to 3 C’s: Corporate curriculum and culture in public schools. Social Justice, 32(3), 72-88.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McCaughan, K. (2013). Barrow’s integration of cognitive and clinical psychology in PBL tutors guidelines. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 7(1), 11–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1318
McMurrer, J. (2007). Choices, changes, and challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
Michaelsen, L. K., & Knight, A. B., & Fink, L. D. (Eds.). (2004). Team-based learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
Neo, M., & Neo, T. K. (2009). Engaging students in multimedia-mediated constructivist learning –students’ perceptions. Educational Technology and Society, 12(2), 254–266.
Next Generation Science Standards. (n.d.). Retrieved from http:// www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
Ogle, D. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 563–570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.39.6.11
Park, S. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2007). Impact of problem-based learning (PBL) on teachers’ beliefs regarding technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 247– 267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782507
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Riojas-Cortez, M., Huerta, M. E., Bustos Flores, B., Pérez, B., & Riojas Clark, E. (2008). Using cultural tools to develop scientific literacy of young Mexican American preschoolers. Early Child Development and Cares, 178(5), 527‒536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004430600851223
Rubin, D. I., Kazanjian, C. J. (2011). “Just Another Brick in the Wall”: Standardization and the devaluing of education. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 5(2), 94–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.3776/joci.2011.v5n2p94-108
Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Savery, J. S. (2006). Overview of PBL: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1995). Problem based learning. An instructional model and its constructionist framework. In B. Wilson (Ed.). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135–148). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Simons, K. D., Klein, J. D., & Brush, T. R. (2004). Instructional strategies utilized during the implementation of hypermedia, problem-based learning environment: A case study. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 15, 213–233.
Street, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge at work in the writing classroom. Multicultural Education, 13(2), 22–25.
Sugarman, S. (2010). Seeing past the fences: Finding funds of knowledge for ethical teaching. The New Educator, 6, 96–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2010.10399592
Tamim, S. R., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Definitions and uses: Case study of teachers implementing project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 7(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1323
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ziegler, S. (1981). The effectiveness of cooperative learning teams for increasing cross-ethnic friendship: Additional evidence. Human Organization, 44, 264–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/humo.40.3.0m0q1143l43r4x44