Enhancing Motivation To Learn In A Biology Laboratory Course Through Gaming A Design Case
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this design case, we describe our work to develop a gameful learning design for use in an introductory, undergraduate biology laboratory course for science majors. Our design team included three university-based mathematics and science educators and a biologist responsible for the management of curriculum and instruction in the course under study. The gameful learning design was employed during the four weeks of plant evolutionary life history instruction. Key challenges to the design and implementation of gameful learning included the adaptation of instruction from teacher-centered to student-centered and establishing novel learning conditions in the eight laboratory sections so as to determine the value of two different elements of game design, repeat-testing and leaderboard with badges.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright © 2026 by the International Journal of Designs for Learning, a publication of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), published by Indiana University Libraries Journals. Permission to make digital or hard copies of portions of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee, provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page in print or the first screen in digital media. Except as otherwise noted, the content published by IJDL is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. A simpler version of this statement is available here.
References
Boling, E. (2010). The Need for Design Cases: Disseminating Design Knowledge. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1, 1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v1i1.919
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9-15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., FernandezSanz, L., Pages, C., & Martínez-Herraiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380-392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
Dondlinger, M. J. (2007). Educational video game design: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 4, 21-31
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affect learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation, 52–72. New York, NY: Guilford.
Gee, J. P. (2005). Good video games and good learning. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 85, 33-37.
Lee, J., & Hammer, E. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15, 1–5
Owens, D. C. (2017). Issues with Tissues: A tale of gameful learning in an introductory undergraduate biology laboratory course. Journal of College Science Teaching. doi: https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17_047_01_38
Owens, D. C. (2019). Overcoming the motivational barriers to understanding and accepting evolution through gameful learning. In U. Harms & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Evolution Education Re-considered. New York: Springer.
Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Barlow, A. T., & Smith-Walters, C. (2017). Student motivation from and resistance to active learning rooted in essential science practices. Research in Science Education, 1-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1
Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8-to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538646
Smith, K. M. (2010). Producing the Rigorous Design Case. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1, 9-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v1i1.917
Squire, K. (2003). Video games in education. In International journal of intelligent simulations and gaming.
Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35, 19–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035008019
Vodopich, D. S., & Moore, R. (2014). Biology laboratory manual (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Education.