The Evolution of Designing E-Service-Learning Projects: A Look at the Development of Instructional Designers
Main Article Content
Abstract
This design case will discuss how design strategies evolved through the development and implementation of two e-service-learning project cohorts. The article provides a detailed account for how Designers for Learning launched its first e-service-learning instructional design project to address adult basic education needs. Information and design feedback gathered at the end of project informed design decisions and changes to the process for a second iteration. The authors discuss the rationale for design decisions made throughout the course of these two cohorts as well as recommendations for mentoring and coaching novice instructional designers through a service-learning project.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright © 2023 by the International Journal of Designs for Learning, a publication of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) and Indiana University. Permission to make digital or hard copies of portions of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page in print or the first screen in digital media. Except as otherwise noted, the content published by IJDL is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA. A simpler version of this statement is available here.
References
Bannan-Ritland, B. (2001). Teaching instructional design: An action learning approach. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14(2), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.2001.tb00208.x
Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 505-518). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_39
Bishop, M.J., Schuch, D., Spector, J.M., & Tracey, M.W. (2004). Providing novice instructional designers real-world experiences: The PacifiCorp design and development competition. Tech Trends, 49(2), 20-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02773966
Boling, E., & Smith, K.M. (2014). Critical issues in studio pedagogy: Beyond the mystique and down to business. In B. Hokanson & A. Gibbons (Eds.), Design in educational technology (pp. 37-56), New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00927-8_3
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2009). Innovative practices in servicelearning and curricular engagement. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009(147), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.356
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https:// doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
Cennamo, K.S., & Holmes, G. (2001). Developing awareness of client relations through immersion in practice. Educational Technology, 41(6), 44-49. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44428709
Collins, A. (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.) Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 47-60). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.) Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Correia, A.-P., Yusop, F. D., Wilson, J. R., & Schwier, R. A. (2010). A comparative case study of approaches to authentic learning in instructional design at two universities. Presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Denver, CO. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509340.pdf
Larson, M. B., & Lockee, B. B. (2009). Preparing instructional designers for different career environments: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9031-4
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. L. (2008). Generative learning: Principles and implications for making meaning. In J. M Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merrienböer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 111124). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Maddrell, J. (2014). Service-learning instructional design considerations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(3), 213-226.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
Mooney, L. A., & Edwards, B. (2001). Experiential learning in sociology: Service learning and other community-based learning initiatives. Teaching Sociology, 181-194. https://doi.org/10.2307/1318716
Quinn, J. (1994). Connecting education and practice in an instructional design graduate program. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298096
Reigeluth, C. M. (1992). Elaborating the elaboration theory. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296844
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Shambaugh, N., & Magliaro, S. (2001). A reflexive model for teaching instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504929
Strait, J., & Sauer, T. (2004). Constructing experiential learning for online courses: The birth of e-Service. Educause Quarterly, 27(1), 62-65. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/103785/
Tessmer, M., & Richey, R.C. (1997). The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 85-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299526
Tracey, M. W., & Boling, E. (2014). Preparing instructional designers: Traditional and emerging perspectives. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 653-660). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_52
Tracey, M. W., Chatervert, C., Lake, K., & Wilson, R. (2008). Real world projects in an advanced instructional design course. TechTrends, 52(4), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-008-0172-7
Tseng, F. C., & Kuo, F. Y. (2014). A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers’ online professional community of practice. Computers & Education, 72, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.005
Waldner, L. S., McGorry, S. Y., & Widener, M. C. (2012). E-servicelearning: The evolution of service-learning to engage a growing online student population. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(2), 123-150. Retrieved from http://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/index.php/jheoe/article/view/792/570
Wilson, J. (2013). Course design using an authentic studio model. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.21432/T22S3P