Using Causal Diagrams to Foster Systems Thinking in Geography Education

Main Article Content

Marjolein Cox
An Steegen
Jan Elen

Abstract

To gain insight into complex sustainability problems and acknowledge complexity is essential and can be achieved by creating an overview of the entire system, including interaction between variables. Therefore, systems thinking is recognized as a vital cognitive skill required to grasp complex global problems. Nevertheless, the implementation of systems thinking into general education, and geography in particular, is sadly limited. Encouraging students to use appropriate tools will probably help them understand systems complexity. A lesson series to foster systems thinking in a Belgian high school geography course was developed and implemented. In this design, produced by researchers in consultation with teachers, students were required to elaborate causal diagrams based on original texts and graphs of complex geographical issues. Causal diagrams are expected to support the development of students’ systems thinking ability. The interpretation of the information sources from a geographical, and thus multidimensional perspective, is the core of inquiry-based instruction aimed at fostering systems thinking. By describing the gradual use of causal diagrams as a tool to visually represent given data, this article contributes an example of this scaffolding technique in geography education. In addition to a description of the lesson series itself, we also discuss how decisions in the design process were influenced by theoretical as well as practical aspects of geography education in Flanders (Belgium). Furthermore, first reflections on the implementation are illustrated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Cox, M., Steegen, A., & Elen, J. (2018). Using Causal Diagrams to Foster Systems Thinking in Geography Education. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 9(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v9i1.22756
Section
Design Cases

References

Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2004). User-centered design. In In B., W., Sims (Ed.), Berkshire encyclopedia of humancomputer interaction (vol. 2, pp. 763-768). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group..

Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44(C), 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050

Cauchy, D., & Luntumbue, M. (2007). Anders denken? Het touwtjesspel Een ecosystemisch voorstel. Rencontre des continents & Quinoa. Retrieved from http://www.jeudelaficelle.net/IMG/pdf/ndl-carnetaccompagnement.pdf

Chang, K.-E., Sung, Y.-T., & Chen, I.-D. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970209602054

Forrester, J. W. (1994). System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. System Dynamics Review, 10(2–3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100211

Hooghuis, F., van der Schee, J., van der Velde, M., Imants, J., & Volman, M. (2014). The adoption of Thinking Through Geography strategies and their impact on teaching geographical reasoning in Dutch secondary schools. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(3), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.927168

Hopper, M., & Stave, K. (2008). Assessing the effectiveness of systems thinking interventions in the classroom. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 1–26. Retrieved from https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/sea_fac_articles/200/

Jeong, A. (2014). Sequentially Analyzing and Modeling Causal Mapping Processes that Support Causal Understanding and Systems Thinking. In D. Ifenthaler D., & R. Hanewald (eds). Digital knowledge maps in education: Technology-enhanced support for teachers and learners (pp. 239–251). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3178-7_13

Karkdijk, J., van der Schee, J., & Admiraal, W. (2013). Effects of teaching with mysteries on students’ geographical thinking skills. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 22(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2013.817664

Leat, D. (1998). Thinking through geography. Cambridge: Chris Kington Publishing.

Mulder, Y. G., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2015). Key characteristics of successful science learning: The promise of learning by modelling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9537-1

Nichols, A., & Kinninment, D. (2001). More thinking through geography. Cambridge: Chris Kington Publishing.

Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. IHMC CmapTools, 1–36. Retrieved from http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf

Öllinger, M., Hammon, S., von Grundherr, M., & Funke, J. (2015). Does visualization enhance complex problem solving? The effect of causal mapping on performance in the computerbased microworld Tailorshop. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(4), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9393-6

Opgenhaffen, T. (2015). Mind the map. Krachtige tools om leren in beeld te brengen. Leuven: LannooCampus.

Plate, R. (2010). Assessing individuals’ understanding of nonlinear causal structures in complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 26(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.432

Richmond, B. (1994). System dynamics/systems thinking: Let’s just get on with it. In International System Dynamics Conference, 10(3), 135-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100204

Scavarda, A. J., Bouzdine-Chameeva, T., Goldstein, S. M., Hays, J. M., & Hill, A. V. (2006). A methodology for constructing collective causal maps. Decision Sciences, 37(2), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2006.00124.x

Sleurs, W., De Smet, V., & Gaeremynck, V. (2008). Duurzame ontwikkeling. Hoe integreren in onderwijs (1st ed.). Antwerpen: De Boeck nv.

Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. (2000). Bathtub dynamics : Initial results of a systems thinking inventory. System Dynamics Review, 16(4), 249–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.198

Vlaams Verbond van het Katholiek Onderwijs. (2004). Aardrijkskunde Derde Graad ASO studierichtingen zonder component wetenschappen leerplan secundair onderwijs. Brussel. Retrieved from http://ond.vvkso-ict.com/leerplannen/doc/Aardrijkskunde-2012-023.pdf