Students as Researchers, Collaborators, & End-users: Informing Campus Design

Main Article Content

Amy M. Huber
Lisa K. Waxman
Stephanie Clemons


Students in undergraduate design programs often lack opportunity to conduct original research and apply their findings to project solutions. Consequently, they struggle with identifying and framing a design problem, understanding the importance of research-based design, and how to appropriately apply research findings to the needs and desires of project stakeholders. In interior design, this unawareness can lead to design solutions that appeal to the eye, but lack defensible rationale and often do not solve the design problem, or meet user needs. Exposure to research methods and collaborations with practitioners may change how students approach design problems by fostering an empathetic understanding of the human experience.

This design case describes a project design at two universities where 72 sophomore and junior students collaborated with furniture manufacturer Herman Miller, Inc. to generate original research before applying their findings to the redesign of informal learning spaces in their campus libraries. Constructivist Learning and Backward Instructional Design, guided the design of the project. The result of this engagement, exposed students to research methods and research integration strategies, who outwardly demonstrated more confidence in making decisions during the design process. While the long-term implications from this type of engagement are not yet evident, encouraging students to ground their design ideas on evidence they have gathered, and their analysis of it, may not only shape their future decision making, but potentially lead to more appropriate client solutions and provide students with coveted job opportunities in positions where evidence-based design is highly valued.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Huber, A. M., Waxman, L. K., & Clemons, S. (2017). Students as Researchers, Collaborators, & End-users: Informing Campus Design. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 8(2).
Author Biographies

Amy M. Huber, Florida State University

Amy M. Huber is an Assistant Professor in the Dept. of Interior Architecture & Design at Florida State University.

Lisa K. Waxman, Florida State University

Lisa K. Waxman is a Professor in the Dept. of Interior Architecture & Design at Florida State University.

Stephanie Clemons, Colorado State University

Stephanie Clemons is a Professor in the Dept. of Design & Merchandising at Colorado State University.


Ankerson, K.S. (n.d.) Collaborations. Retrieved on August 26, 2015 from

Ankerson, K.S. & Pable, J. (2008). Interior Design: Practical strategies for teaching and learning. New York, NY: Fairchild Books, Inc.

Baumgartner, L. M. (2001). An update on transformational learning theory. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), The new update on adult learning theory (pp. 15-24). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 89. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhard, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay Company.

Brown, J.S, Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.

CIDA. (2014). Future Vision Report. Retrieved March 26, 2015, from

Dickinson, J. I, Marsden, J. P., & Read, M. (2007). Empirical design research: Student definitions, perceptions, and values. Journal of Interior Design, 32(2), 1-12.

Fink, D.L. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Huber, A., & Pable, J. (2015). When worlds collide: Student perceptions of environmental context during an immersive work experience. Selected papers from the International Conference on Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, FL. Retrieved from

Irish, J. (2013) Ty gywn: Documenting the design of a special school in Wales. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 4(2), 41-44.

Kaup, M., Kim, H. C., & Dudek, M. (2013). Planning to learn: The role of interior design in educational settings. International Journal of Designs for Learning 4(2), 41-44.

Lebow, D. (1995). Constructivist values for instructional design: A case study of a graduate-level learning environment (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from

Martin, C.S. (2009). The challenge of integrating evidence-based design. Health Environments Research and Design Journal, 2(3), 29-50.

Martin, C. & Guerin, D. (2010). The state of the interior design profession. New York, NY: Fairchild Books, Inc.

Maturana, B. (2014). Where is the ‘problem’ in design studio: Purpose and significance of the design tasks. International Journal of Architectural Research, 8(3), 32-44.

Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. (Trans A. Rosin). New York, NY: Viking Press.

Salama, A.M. (2010). Delivering theory courses in architecture: Inquiry-based, active, and experiential learning integrated. International Journal of Architectural Research, 4(2-3), 278-295.

Salama, A.M. (2015). Spatial design education. Ashgate: Surrey, England.

Steelcase Educational Solutions. (2014). Going beyond campus lecture halls. Retrieved from

von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). The reluctance to change a way of thinking. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 83-90.

Waxman, L., Clemons, S., Banning, J., & McKelfresh, D. (2007). The library as place: Providing students with opportunities for socialization, relaxation, and restoration. New Library World, 108(9/10), 424-434.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.