Gamifying a Course to Teach Games and Simulations for Learning

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Nov 8, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v8i2.20897

Main Article Content

Susan L. Stansberry
Oklahoma State University
Scott M. Haselwood
Oklahoma State University

Abstract

This design case includes the challenges, considerations, and decisions associated with the design, development, and delivery of a master’s level educational technology course on teaching and learning with games and simulations. A master’s level course, Digital Games and Simulations in the Classroom, faced redesign in order to add a gamification component to be modeled through 3D GameLab and Shivtr. The design decisions made and resulting issues are detailed in this paper. This paper aims to reveal benefits in two key areas: (a) helping a population of primarily non-gamer educational technology graduate students see games and simulations as viable resources for improving learning and (b) modeling gamification as a means to help instructors use gamification as their own instructional strategy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Stansberry, S. L., & Haselwood, S. M. (2017). Gamifying a Course to Teach Games and Simulations for Learning. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v8i2.20897
Issue
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2017)
Section
Design Cases

Copyright © 2025 by the International Journal of Designs for Learning, a publication of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), published by Indiana University Libraries Journals. Permission to make digital or hard copies of portions of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee, provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page in print or the first screen in digital media. Except as otherwise noted, the content published by IJDL is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. A simpler version of this statement is available here.

Author Biographies

Susan L. Stansberry, Oklahoma State University

Susan L. Stansberry is an Associate Professor of Educational Technology, T.E.C.H. Playground Director, and Head of the School of Educational Studies at Oklahoma State University. Her research interests include learning design and technology, creativity, and curiosity.

Scott M. Haselwood, Oklahoma State University

Scott M. Haselwood is a candidate in the Ph.D. in Education/Educational Technology program at Oklahoma State University and the Director Instructional Technology at the University of Science & Arts of Oklahoma. His research interests include gamification, professional development, and social media.

References

Boling, E. (2010). The need for design cases: Disseminating design knowledge. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v1i1.919

Carstens, A., & Beck, J. (2005). Get ready for the gamer generation. TechTrends, 49(3), 22-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763643

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9-15). Tampere, Finland: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Gee, J. P. (2005). Learning by design: Games as learning machines. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.5

Harman, K., Koohang, A., & Paliszkiewicz, J. (2014). Scholarly interest in gamification: A citation network analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(9), 1438-1452. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2014-0208

Kim, B. (2015). Designing gamification in the right way. Library Technology Reports, 51(2), 29-35.

Ruhi, U. (2015). Level up your strategy: Towards a descriptive framework for meaningful enterprise gamification. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(8), 5-16.

Simpson, E. A., & Stansberry, S. L. (2008). Video games and teacher development: Bridging the gap in the classroom. In C. T. Miller, (Ed.), Games: Purpose and potential in education (pp. 163-184). New York, NY: Springer.