Design and Implementation of a Technology-Supported Socioscientfic Inquiry Unit in High School Biology

Main Article Content

Thomas Brush
Suhkyung Shin
Sungwon Shin
Jiyoon Jung
John Gensic
Krista Glazewski

Abstract

Socioscientific Inquiry (SSI) represents an instructional approach designed to target interest and knowledge in science. In this context, students consider scientific issues that have social implications and comprise a range of trade-offs, concepts, and considerations in order to arrive at informed conclusions (Sadler, 2004, 2011). Given the potential benefits to students on utilizing SSI within K-12 instruction, it is important to explore the challenges to implementing SSI in authentic classrooms settings. Doing so may provide additional insight into how to better partner with teachers to successfully implement SSI instruction. This design case describes an iterative inquiry curricular design process within the context of a 9th grade science classroom. Specifically, our case attempts to increase our understanding of the SSI design and implementation process as it applies to a high school classroom context, and enables us to understand what kind of instructional supports most benefit students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Brush, T., Shin, S., Shin, S., Jung, J., Gensic, J., & Glazewski, K. (2016). Design and Implementation of a Technology-Supported Socioscientfic Inquiry Unit in High School Biology. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v7i2.20124
Section
K-12 Classroom Implementation

References

Brush, T. & Saye, J. (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers and students using multimediasupported learning environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2). Retrieved from: http://www.ncolr.org/issues/jiol/v1/n2/a-summary-of-research-exploring-hard-and-soft-scaffolding-forteachers-and-students-using-a-multimedia-supported-learningenvironment

Brush, T. & Saye, J. (2014). An instructional model to support problem-based historical inquiry: The persistent issues in history network. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(1), 39-50.

Glazewski, K., Shuster, M., Brush, T. & Ellis, A. (2014). Conexiones: Fostering socioscientific inquiry in graduate teacher preparation. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(1), 21-38.

Loukomies, A., Pnevmatikos, D., Lavonen, J., Spyrtou, A., Byman, R., Kariotoglou, P., & Juuti, K. (2013). Promoting students’ interest and motivation towards science learning: The role of personal needs and motivation orientations. Research In Science Education, 43(6), 2517-2539.

National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education practices. cross-cutting concepts, and core Ideas. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press. Retrieved October 13, 2015 from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/13165/a-framework-for-k12-science-education-practices-crosscutting-concepts.

Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 513-536.

Sadler, T. D. (Ed.). (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research. New York, NY: Springer.

Saunders, K. & Rennie, L. (2013). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientific issues in science. Research in Science Education, 43, 253-274.

Saye, J. & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about hisotry and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77-96.

Saye, J. & Brush, T. (2004). Promoting civic competence through problem-based history learning experiments. In G.E. Hamot, J.J. Patrick, & R.S. Leming (Eds.), Civic learning in teacher education (Vol. 3, pp. 123-145). Bloomington, IN: The Social Studies Development Center.

Xu, J., Coats, L. T., & Davidson, M. L. (2012). Promoting student interest in science: The perspectives of exemplary African American teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 49(1), 124-154.