Treating Museum Objects as Text: A Case Study Part 1 of 2
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Medical instrument collections are neglected primary source material that can be used to produce original scholarship on the
history of medicine and the history of optometry. Opening museum collections and associated archives to researchers allows
collections managers to simultaneously address curatorial backlogs, facilitate research, and provide a foundation for crafting
public-facing exhibits. In order to add to the historiography, research should not only focus on the technical aspects of the
instruments, but also employ theory to examine of the meaning of the objects in context. In this way, objects can be a vehicle for
understanding broader themes in the history of medicine and reveal their utility as material evidence of the impact of medicine
on society and culture. This two-part article includes a historiography of ophthalmic instruments and a case study in which an assemblage of ophthalmometers in the Archives & Museum of Optometry collection are treated as “text” to explore the nature of power in the doctor-patient relationship in early optometry.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. By submitting to Hindsight: Journal of Optometry History, the author grants to the journal the non-exclusive right to
reproduce, translate (as defined below), and/or distribute your submission worldwide in print and electronic format
and in any medium, including but not limited to audio or video.
2. The author agrees that Hindsight: Journal of Optometry History may, without changing the content, translate the
submission to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation.
3. The author agrees that Hindsight: Journal of Optometry History may keep more than one copy of this submission for
purposes of security, back-up, and preservation.
4. The author represents that the submission is his/her original work, and that s/he has the right to grant the rights
contained in this agreement. The author also represents that his/her submission does not, to the best of his/her
knowledge, infringe upon anyone's copyright.
5. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's
published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or a website or publish it in a book), with
an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
References
2. Arnold K, Söderqvist T. Medical Instruments in Museums: Immediate Impressions and Historical Meanings. Isis 2011;102: 720. doi:10.1086/663613.
3. Hebert, K. Rare Ophthalmic Periodicals: The Historiography of The Profession At Risk. Hindsight: J Optom Hist 2018;49:57.
4. La Berge A. The History of Science and the History of Microscopy. Perspect Sci 1999;7:111. doi.org/10.1162/posc.1999.7.1.111
5. The full text of the Bulletin of the History of Medicine is searchable by keyword and subject on the Johns Hopkins University Press website: https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/bulletin-history-medicine. Search for “optometry” performed October 1, 2018.
6. The full text of Hindsight: Journal of Optometry History is searchable by keyword and subject on Indiana University’s Scholarworks website: https://scholarworks. iu.edu/journals/index.php/hindsight/issue/archive. Search performed October 1, 2018.
7. For example see Keeler R, Singh AD, Dua HS. Calculating curves: keratometers and ophthalmometers Br J Ophthal 2010;94:1144.
8. Stuckey KA, Albert DM. Hirschberg’s History of Ophthalmology. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105(6):758. doi:10.1001/archopht.1987.010600600440
9. Lingis A. Anthropology as a Natural Science Clifford Geertz’s Extrinsic Theory of the Mind. Open J Philos, 2014;4:96. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2014.42014.
10. Siegler M. The Three Ages of Medicine and the Doctor Patient Relationship. In Fundació Víctor Grífols i Lucas. c/ Jesús i Maria, eds. Monographs of the Víctor Grífols i Lucas Foundation. Barcelona, Spain, 2011:13. Accessed 31 August 2018 at https://www.fundaciogrifols.org/ documents/4662337/4689077/monograph26.pdf/f5841492-7051-4cec-aa21-eb32a3ebc30c
11. Rabier C. Introduction: the crafting of medicine in the early industrial age. Technol Cult 2013;54:437-459. Doi: 10.1353/tech2013.0090
12. Wexler A. The Medical Battery in The United States (1870–1920): Electrotherapy at Home and in the Clinic. J Hist Med Allied Sci 2017; 72:166–192, https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrx001
13. Taub L. Introduction: Reengaging with Instruments. Isis 2011;102: 694. doi:10.1086/663605.