GRJ Review Rubric
|
Criteria |
Excellent 4 |
Good 3 |
Acceptable 2 |
Unacceptable 1 |
Score |
|
Clearly stated, demanding thesis |
Strong introduction of topic’s key question(s), terms. Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. |
Conveys topic and key question(s). Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. |
Conveys topic, but not key question(s). Describes subtopics to be reviewed. |
Does not adequately convey topic. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed. |
|
|
Thorough and cogent illustration of points pertaining to thesis or argument |
All material clearly related to subtopic, main topic. Strong organization and integration of material within subtopics. Strong transitions. |
All material clearly related to subtopic, main topic and logically organized within subtopics. Clear and varied transitions. |
Most material clearly related to subtopic, main topic. Material may not be organized within subtopics. Attempts to provide transitions. |
Little evidence material is logically organized into topic, subtopics or related to topic. Transitions are unclear or nonexistent. |
|
|
Adequate explanation of alternative theories or schools of thought |
Author anticipates and successfully defuses counter-arguments; makes novel connections to outside material. |
Some evidence that counter-arguments acknowledged, though perhaps not addressed. Occasional insightful insights to outside material |
May not address counter-arguments or make any outside connections. |
Simplistic view of topic; no effort to grasp possible alternative views. |
|
|
Appropriate conclusion which follows logically from thesis and support |
Strong review of key concepts. Strong integration with thesis statement. Insightful discussion of impact of the research on topic. |
Strong review of key concepts. Strong integration with thesis statement. Discusses impact of researched material on topic. |
Review of key concepts. Some integration with thesis statement. Discusses impact of researched material on topic. |
Does not summarize evidence with respect to thesis statement. Does not discuss the impact of researched material on topic. |
|
|
Consistent and appropriate use of scholarly sources, properly cited and documented |
All references and citations are correctly written. |
One reference or citation missing or incorrectly written. |
Two references or citations missing or incorrectly written. |
References and citation errors detract significantly from paper. |
|