Whose Sidewalk? Tactically Negotiating the Boundary between Public and Private Space in Limassol
Main Article Content
Abstract
Home is a nodal point in a series of polarities, including family-community; space-place; inside-outside; private-public; domestic-social. These may not be stable but seem both solidified and undermined as they play out their meaning and practice in and through the home. The “public” is traditionally the state’s domain, while the “private” the citizens’. But where does “private” end and “public” begin? Can a border or boundary be placed between the two? Is such a boundary culture-specific or universal? Is it static or dynamic? Scholars often perceive borders as barriers and bridges, porous and impenetrable, and border studies have shown that urban entities have their own internal and external borders. I argue that such internal urban micro-boundaries can be found in the domain of domestic space, separating the private from the public, and that they are dynamic and constantly negotiated. Not necessarily marked, they are acknowledged by a mutual and tacit agreement, a social and cultural consensus. In this paper, I focus on common expansions of private into public space in Limassol, Cyprus, and the ways in which, this social consensus is achieved through the use of several tactics. As I illustrate, all these tactics seem to transform public space into private, on a symbolic level. The paper’s contribution lies in the examination of this type of boundary, which has received little academic attention, as well as in the introduction of the term “tactics of inhibition.”
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. While AEER adopts the above strategies in line with best practices common to the open access journal community, it urges authors to promote use of this journal (in lieu of subsequent duplicate publication of unaltered papers) and to acknowledge the unpaid investments made during the publication process by peer-reviewers, editors, copy editors, programmers, layout editors and others involved in supporting the work of the journal.
References
Argyrou, V., 1996a. Tradition and modernity in the Mediterranean: the wedding as symbolic struggle. Cambridge University Press.
Attfield, J., 1999. “Bringing modernity home: open plan in the British domestic interior.” In At Home: An anthropology of domestic space edited by Irene Cieraad, 73-82. Syracuse University Press.
Bachelard, G. 2014 [1958]. The Poetics of Space. Penguin Classics.
Benjamin, D. and Stea, D., 1995. The Home, Interpretations, Meanings and Environments. Aldershot: Avebury.
Bernstein, A. and E. Mertz. 2011. “Introduction bureaucracy: Ethnography of the state in everyday life.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 34 no. 1: 6-10.
Bernstein, B. 1971. Class, codes and control, Vol 1, Routtedge and Kegan Paul.
Birdwell-Pheasant, D. and Lawrence-Züniga, D. (eds.). 2020. House life: space, place and family in Europe. Routledge.
Buchli, V., 2002. Architecture and the domestic sphere. In The material culture reader, edited by Victor Buchli, 207-236. Berg Publishers.
Campbell, H. and Heyman, J., 2007. “Slantwise: Beyond domination and resistance on the border.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36 no. 1: 3-30.
Carsten, J. and Hugh-Jones, S. eds., 1995. About the house: Lévi-Strauss and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
Cieraad I. 1999. At home. An anthropology of domestic space. Syracuse University Press, New York.
Corbetta, P. 2003. Social research: Theory, methods and techniques. Sage.
Creed, G.W., 2010. Domesticating revolution: from socialist reform to ambivalent transition in a Bulgarian village. Penn State Press.
Duncan, J., 1995. “Landscape geography, 1993-94.” Progress in human geography, 19 no. 4: 14-422.
Hall, P.A., 1999. “Social capital in Britain.” British journal of political science, 29 no. 3: 417-461.
Herzfeld, M. 1993. The social production of indifference. University of Chicago Press.
Heyman, J. 2004. “The anthropology of power-wielding bureaucracies.” Human Organization, 63 no. 4: 487–500.
Hou, J. ed., 2010. Insurgent public space: guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities. Routledge.
Kyriakides, T. 2018. “Tactics of association.” Social Anthropology, 26 no. 4: 471-486.
Labov, W., 1966. “Hypercorrection by the lower middle class as a factor in linguistic change.” Sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 84 no. 10: 322-264.
Laermans, R. and Meulders, C., 1999. “The domestication of laundering.” In At home: An anthropology of domestic space, edited by Irene Cieraad, 132-154. Syracuse University Press.
Lipsky, M., 1984. Bureaucratic disentitlement in social welfare programs. Social Service Review, 58 no. 1: 3-27.
Miller, D. ed., 2001. Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: Berg.
Papadakis, Y. 2001. Cyprus. In Ember, M. and Ember, C.R. (eds). Countries and their cultures, edited by Carol Ember, 613-618. Macmillan Reference USA.
Pfeifer, L., 2013. The planner’s guide to tactical urbanism. Montereal, Canada Page.
Prior, N., 2002. Histories of leisure. Berg.
Rapoport, A., 1969. House form and Cultua. London-University College: New Delhi: Prentice-hall of India Private Ltd.
Rosselin, C., 1999. “The ins and outs of the hall: A Parisian example.” In At home: An anthropology of domestic space, edited by Irene Cieraad, 53-69. Syracuse University Press.
Sack, R.D., 1983. “Human territoriality: a theory.” Annals of the association of American geographers, 73 no. 1: 55-74.
Samanani, F. and Lenhard, J., 2019. Introduction: Ethnography, dwelling and home-making. In Home: ethnographic encounters, edited by Farhan Samanani and Johannes Lenhart, 1-29. Bloomsbury Academic.
Shields, R., 1992. “A truant proximity: presence and absence in the space of modernity.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 10 no. 2: 181-198.
Theodossopoulos D., 2014. “On De-Pathologizing Resistance.” History and Anthropology, 25 no. 4: 415-430.
Van Gennep, A., 2019 [1909]. The rites of passage. University of Chicago Press.
Wilson, T.M. and Donnan, H., 1998. Nation, state and identity at international borders. Campbridge University Press.
Wilson, T.M., 2014. Borders: Cities, boundaries, and frontiers. In A companion to urban anthropology, edited by Donald Nonini, 103-19. Wiley Blackwell.
Wise, J.M., 2000. “Home: Territory and identity.” Cultural studies, 14 no. 2: 295-310.