The Soviet, the European, The Latvian: Implementing Global Patient Safety Standards in post-Soviet Latvia
Main Article Content
Abstract
Patient safety issues gained global attention when evidence of modern medicine’s negative impacts on patient health and wellbeing emerged. Such “side effects” of modern medicine as antimicrobial resistance, medication errors, device failures and healthcare-acquired infections have created problems for patients and health services in all countries. Since the late 1990s these patient safety issues have been high on the transnational healthcare agendas. The global concern of patient safety has resulted in international standardization of patient safety in formulating and implementing policies and producing new practices and biomedical knowledge.
The article is based on one year of fieldwork data (interviews with hospital infection control specialists, interviews and focus group discussions with patients, and analysis of political documents and electronic media) completed within an interdisciplinary research project on biosafety and biotechnologies. Not only have patients and microbes become “mobile” - patient safety standards are “travelling” between different locations and contexts. In post-Soviet Latvia, the interaction between the Soviet legacy, local specificity, and globalized standards of patient safety creates culturally specific understandings and practices of hospital infection control. In Latvia, infection control discourse has come to deal less with patient safety risks but more with the struggle between new biomedical knowledge and firmly fixed healthcare practices and the power relationships between patients and physicians, as well as general medical staff and infection control specialists.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. While AEER adopts the above strategies in line with best practices common to the open access journal community, it urges authors to promote use of this journal (in lieu of subsequent duplicate publication of unaltered papers) and to acknowledge the unpaid investments made during the publication process by peer-reviewers, editors, copy editors, programmers, layout editors and others involved in supporting the work of the journal.