Panentheism is Still Vague: A Reply to Lataster and Bilimoria

Main Article Content

R. T. Mullins

Abstract

In a recent paper on panentheism, Raphael Lataster and Purushottama Bilimoria offer a critique of several contemporary attempts to define what panentheism is and what panentheism is not. Lataster and Bilimoria find the recent attempts to define panentheism deficient. In particular, they find my approach to panentheism to be riddled with problems. In my reply, I explain that Lataster and Bilimoria have failed to explain what panentheism is and what it is not.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mullins, R. T. (2019). Panentheism is Still Vague: A Reply to Lataster and Bilimoria. Journal of World Philosophies, 4(1), 204–207. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/index.php/jwp/article/view/2656
Section
Responses
Author Biography

R. T. Mullins

R.T. Mullins (PhD, University of St. Andrews) specializes in philosophical theology. He has published on topics such as God and time, the Trinity, the Incarnation, disability theology, and the problem of evil. His book, The End of the Timeless God, was released in 2016 by Oxford University Press. He has previously held research and teaching fellowships at the University of Notre Dame and the University of Cambridge. Currently, he is a research and teaching fellow at the University of St. Andrews.