Panentheism is Still Vague: A Reply to Lataster and Bilimoria
Main Article Content
Abstract
In a recent paper on panentheism, Raphael Lataster and Purushottama Bilimoria offer a critique of several contemporary attempts to define what panentheism is and what panentheism is not. Lataster and Bilimoria find the recent attempts to define panentheism deficient. In particular, they find my approach to panentheism to be riddled with problems. In my reply, I explain that Lataster and Bilimoria have failed to explain what panentheism is and what it is not.
Article Details
How to Cite
Mullins, R. T. (2019). Panentheism is Still Vague: A Reply to Lataster and Bilimoria. Journal of World Philosophies, 4(1), 204–207. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/index.php/jwp/article/view/2656
Issue
Section
Responses
JWP is an open access journal, using a Creative Commons license. Authors submitting an article for publication to JWP agree on the following terms:
- The Author grants and assigns to the Press the full and exclusive rights during the term of copyright to publish or cause others to publish the said Contribution in all forms, in all media, and in all languages throughout the world.
- In consideration of the rights granted above, the Press grants all users, without charge, the right to republish the Contribution in revised or unrevised form, in any language, and that it carries the appropriate copyright notice and standard form of scholarly acknowledgement as applicable under the CC-BY license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.