Response to Steve Fuller, “‘China’ as the West’s Other in World Philosophy”
Main Article Content
Abstract
Fuller’s critique of my work is based on the anthropological distinction between “functional” and “substantive” interpretations. However, he has used these terms in non-standard ways that may lead to confusion. Furthermore, in either the standard or Fuller’s senses of these terms, he has misdescribed my position.
Article Details
How to Cite
Van Norden, B. W. (2018). Response to Steve Fuller, “‘China’ as the West’s Other in World Philosophy”. Journal of World Philosophies, 3(2), 134–136. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/index.php/jwp/article/view/2164
Issue
Section
Book Reviews
JWP is an open access journal, using a Creative Commons license. Authors submitting an article for publication to JWP agree on the following terms:
- The Author grants and assigns to the Press the full and exclusive rights during the term of copyright to publish or cause others to publish the said Contribution in all forms, in all media, and in all languages throughout the world.
- In consideration of the rights granted above, the Press grants all users, without charge, the right to republish the Contribution in revised or unrevised form, in any language, and that it carries the appropriate copyright notice and standard form of scholarly acknowledgement as applicable under the CC-BY license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.