Predictors of the Existence of Congregational HIV Programs: Similarities and Differences Compared with other Health Programs

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Malcolm V.
dc.contributor.authorHaas, Ann
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, Beth Ann
dc.contributor.authorFulton, Brad R.
dc.contributor.authorKanouse, David E.
dc.contributor.authorBogart, Laura M.
dc.contributor.authorDerose, Kathryn Pitkin
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-25T19:47:22Z
dc.date.available2019-03-25T19:47:22Z
dc.date.issued2015-07
dc.descriptionAccepted manuscript, postprint version.en
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Identify and compare predictors of the existence of congregational human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other health programs. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: United States. Subjects: A nationally representative sample of 1506 U.S. congregations surveyed in the National Congregations Study (2006–2007). Measures: Key informants at each congregation completed in-person and telephone interviews on congregational HIV and other health programs and various congregation characteristics (response rate = 78%). County-level HIV prevalence and population health data from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's 2007 County Health Rankings were linked to the congregational data. Analysis: Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess factors that predict congregational health programs relative to no health programs; and of HIV programs relative to other health activities. Results: Most congregations (57.5%) had at least one health-related program; many fewer (5.7%) had an HIV program. Predictors of health vs. HIV programs differed. The number of adults in the congregation was a key predictor of health programs, while having an official statement welcoming gay persons was a significant predictor of HIV programs (p < .05). Other significant characteristics varied by size of congregation and type of program (HIV vs. other health). Conclusion: Organizations interested in partnering with congregations to promote health or prevent HIV should consider congregational size as well as other factors that predict involvement. Results of this study can inform policy interventions to increase the capacity of religious congregations to address HIV and health.en
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, Malcolm, Laura Bogart, Kathryn Derose, Brad R. Fulton, Beth Ann Griffin, Ann Haas, and David Kanouse. “Predictors of Congregational HIV Programs: Similarities and DifferencesCompared with Other Health Programs.” American Journal of Health Promotion29:225-35.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.130531-QUAN-280
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/22855
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican Journal of Health Promotionen
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.4278/ajhp.130531-QUAN-280en
dc.subjectHIVen
dc.subjectCongregationsen
dc.subjectHealth Promotionen
dc.subjectPrevention Researchen
dc.titlePredictors of the Existence of Congregational HIV Programs: Similarities and Differences Compared with other Health Programsen
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Predictors of the Existence of Congregational HIV Programs.pdf
Size:
785.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections

If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to iusw@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.