Environmental Decision Making in the Argentine Delta

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.

Date

2013-05

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Abstract

This analysis focuses on decision making by groups of people (organizations, government) in addressing a particular political issue (failure by the government to enforce water quality regulations in the Paraná Delta of Argentina). A subjective ethnographic approach teases out the subtleties to understand the context in which legal redress is thwarted by a stew of good intentions, suspicions, poor communication, entrenched interests, and institutional dysfunction. The process that ultimately leads to a decision by a judicial arm of government does not readily fit general process models of decision making; instead it evokes a set of concepts that characterize and underscore the situation’s uniqueness. The goals, methods, and interpretations in this study enrich and extend the dimensions of the comparative decision making project by incorporating a humanities perspective. In contrast with the objective behavioral approaches noted in the previous chapters, here the relation between intention and outcome plays a central role. Kane’s analysis focuses on decision making by groups of people (organizations, government) in addressing a particular political issue (failure by the government to enforce water quality regulations in the Paraná Delta of Argentina). She uses a subjective ethnographic approach to tease out the subtleties and to understand the context in which legal redress is thwarted by a stew of good intentions, suspicions, poor communication, entrenched interests, and institutional dysfunction. The process that ultimately leads to a decision by a judicial arm of government does not readily fit general process models of decision making; instead it evokes a set of concepts that characterize and underscore the situation’s uniqueness. The goals, methods, and interpretations in this study enrich and extend the dimensions of the comparative decision-making project by incorporating a humanities perspective. In contrast with the objective behavioral approaches emphasized in most of the book’s chapters, here the relation between intention and outcome plays a central role.

Description

Publisher's, offprint version

Keywords

groups, organizations, government, Argentina, ethnography, institutional dysfunction, intention, outcome

Citation

Kane, Stephanie. "Environmental Decision-Making in the Argentine Delta." Pp. 77-101. In, Comparative Decision Making. Phil Crowley and Thomas Zentall, Editors. New York: Oxford U. Press.

Journal

Relation

Rights

Type

Book chapter