Climate Change, West Virginia v. EPA, and the SEC's Distinctive Statutory Mandate.

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Cynthia A.
dc.contributor.authorNagy, Donna M.
dc.contributor.authorFisch, Jill E.
dc.contributor.authorGeorgiev, George S.
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-27T18:56:34Z
dc.date.available2026-08-27T18:56:34Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionAs of 8/27/2026, there were 0 downloads from the previous repository platform.
dc.description.abstractIn March 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed a rule that would require publicly traded companies to provide investors with various climate-related disclosures. See The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors, 87 Fed. Reg. 21344 (Apr. 11, 2022) (the Proposal). The rule has generated extensive debate; to date, the SEC has received more than 4,000 substantive comment letters and more than 10,000 form letters. Commenters have raised a variety of concerns about the Proposal, including questioning the extent to which the SEC has the authority to mandate climate-related disclosure. Since the Supreme Court’s June 2022 ruling in West Virginia v. EPA, some commentators have also asserted that the Proposal runs afoul of the major questions doctrine (MQD).
dc.identifier.citation47 Admin. & Reg. L. News 9 (2021-2022)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/38549
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAdministrative & REgulatory Law News
dc.relation.journalAdministrative & REgulatory Law News
dc.rightsThis work is protected by copyright unless stated otherwise.
dc.rights.uri
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.subjectclimate law
dc.subjectcorporate law
dc.titleClimate Change, West Virginia v. EPA, and the SEC's Distinctive Statutory Mandate.
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
C.Williams 47AdminRegLNews9.pdf
Size:
147.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us