Climate Change, West Virginia v. EPA, and the SEC's Distinctive Statutory Mandate.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Other Version

External File or Record

Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Administrative & REgulatory Law News

Abstract

In March 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed a rule that would require publicly traded companies to provide investors with various climate-related disclosures. See The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors, 87 Fed. Reg. 21344 (Apr. 11, 2022) (the Proposal). The rule has generated extensive debate; to date, the SEC has received more than 4,000 substantive comment letters and more than 10,000 form letters. Commenters have raised a variety of concerns about the Proposal, including questioning the extent to which the SEC has the authority to mandate climate-related disclosure. Since the Supreme Court’s June 2022 ruling in West Virginia v. EPA, some commentators have also asserted that the Proposal runs afoul of the major questions doctrine (MQD).

Series and Number:

EducationalLevel:

Is Based On:

Target Name:

Teaches:

Table of Contents

Description

As of 8/27/2026, there were 0 downloads from the previous repository platform.

Keywords

Climate change, climate law, corporate law

Citation

47 Admin. & Reg. L. News 9 (2021-2022)

Journal

Administrative & REgulatory Law News

DOI

Rights

This work is protected by copyright unless stated otherwise.

Type

Article