Climate Change, West Virginia v. EPA, and the SEC's Distinctive Statutory Mandate.
Loading...
Other Version
External File or Record
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Administrative & REgulatory Law News
Permanent Link
Abstract
In March 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed a rule that would require publicly traded companies to provide investors with various climate-related disclosures. See The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors, 87 Fed. Reg. 21344 (Apr. 11, 2022) (the Proposal). The rule has generated extensive debate; to date, the SEC has received more than 4,000 substantive comment letters and more than 10,000 form letters. Commenters have raised a variety of concerns about the Proposal, including questioning the extent to which the SEC has the authority to mandate climate-related disclosure. Since the Supreme Court’s June 2022 ruling in West Virginia v. EPA, some commentators have also asserted that the Proposal runs afoul of the major questions doctrine (MQD).
Series and Number:
EducationalLevel:
Is Based On:
Target Name:
Teaches:
Table of Contents
Description
As of 8/27/2026, there were 0 downloads from the previous repository platform.
Keywords
Climate change, climate law, corporate law
Citation
47 Admin. & Reg. L. News 9 (2021-2022)
Journal
Administrative & REgulatory Law News
DOI
Rights
This work is protected by copyright unless stated otherwise.
Type
Article