What is the right formalism to search for resonances? II. The pentaquark chain
dc.contributor.author | Pilloni, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nys, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mikhasenko, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Albaladejo, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fernández-Ramírez, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jackura, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mathieu, Vincent | |
dc.contributor.author | Sherrill, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Skwarnicki, T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Szczepaniak, Adam P | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-20T16:21:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-20T16:21:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-09-08 | |
dc.description.abstract | We discuss the differences between several partial-wave analysis formalisms used in the construction of three-body decay amplitudes involving fermions. Specifically, we consider the decay $\Lambda _b \rightarrow \psi \,p K^-$, where the hidden charm pentaquark signal has been reported. We analyze the analytical properties of the amplitudes and separate kinematical and dynamical singularities. The result is an amplitude with the minimal energy dependence compatible with the S-matrix principles. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Pilloni, A., et al. "What is the right formalism to search for resonances? II. The pentaquark chain." European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields, vol. C78, no. 9, pp. 727, 2018-9-8, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6177-2. | |
dc.identifier.other | BRITE 4004 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2022/30610 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.relation.isversionof | https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6177-2 | |
dc.relation.isversionof | https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140%2Fepjc%2Fs10052-018-6177-2.pdf | |
dc.relation.journal | European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields | |
dc.title | What is the right formalism to search for resonances? II. The pentaquark chain |
Files
Collections
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us