Flying vs. Jump Kicks: Defining Ordinary Action in Sport

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Megenty was injured while holding a standing padded bag when a fellow karate participant performed a jump kick instead of a flying kick into the bag. The Megenity v. Dunn ruling supports the general concept of primary assumption of risk and places the responsibility of understanding the associated risks of a sport on the participants.

Series and Number:

EducationalLevel:

Is Based On:

Target Name:

Teaches:

Table of Contents

Description

This record is for a(n) postprint of an article published by SHAPE America in Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance on 2018-01-05; the version of record is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2018.1393226.

Keywords

Citation

Purcell, Alexander, and Young, Sarah J. "Flying vs. Jump Kicks: Defining Ordinary Action in Sport." Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance, 2018-1-5, https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2018.1393226.

Journal

Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance

DOI

Link(s) to data and video for this item

Relation

Rights

Type