Flying vs. Jump Kicks: Defining Ordinary Action in Sport
Loading...
Other Version
External File or Record
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Permanent Link
Abstract
Megenty was injured while holding a standing padded bag when a fellow karate participant performed a jump kick instead of a flying kick into the bag. The Megenity v. Dunn ruling supports the general concept of primary assumption of risk and places the responsibility of understanding the associated risks of a sport on the participants.
Series and Number:
EducationalLevel:
Is Based On:
Target Name:
Teaches:
Table of Contents
Description
This record is for a(n) postprint of an article published by SHAPE America in Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance on 2018-01-05; the version of record is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2018.1393226.
Keywords
Citation
Purcell, Alexander, and Young, Sarah J. "Flying vs. Jump Kicks: Defining Ordinary Action in Sport." Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance, 2018-1-5, https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2018.1393226.
Journal
Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance
DOI
Rights
This work may be protected by copyright unless otherwise stated.