Religious Arguments, Religious Purposes, and the Gay and Lesbian Rights Cases

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Other Version

External File or Record

Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

The Supreme Court's four major gay and lesbian rights decisions-Romer v. Evans, Lawrence v. Texas, United States v. Windsor, and Obergefell v. Hodges-were not cases about the First Amendment or religion. But collectively, often implicitly and sometimes explicitly, these cases teach us something about the role which religion should play in questions of constitutional equality and liberty.

Series and Number:

EducationalLevel:

Is Based On:

Target Name:

Teaches:

Table of Contents

Description

This record is for a(n) offprint of an article published in First Amendment Law Review on 2018-09-20.

Keywords

Citation

Sanders, Steve. "Religious Arguments, Religious Purposes, and the Gay and Lesbian Rights Cases." First Amendment Law Review, vol. 17, pp. 237-248, 2018-09-20.

Journal

First Amendment Law Review

DOI

Rights

This work may be protected by copyright unless otherwise stated.

Type