Popular and/or Prestigious? Measures of Scholarly Esteem

dc.contributor.authorCronin, Blaise
dc.contributor.authorDing, Ying
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T13:31:23Z
dc.date.available2011-01-25T13:31:23Z
dc.date.issued2011-01
dc.description.abstractCitation analysis does not generally take the quality of citations into account: all citations are weighted equally irrespective of source. However, a scholar may be highly cited but not highly regarded: popularity and prestige are not identical measures of esteem. In this study we define popularity as the number of times an author is cited and prestige as the number of times an author is cited by highly cited papers. Information retrieval (IR) is the test field. We compare the 40 leading researchers in terms of their popularity and prestige over time. Some authors are ranked high on prestige but not on popularity, while others are ranked high on popularity but not on prestige. We also relate measures of popularity and prestige to date of Ph.D. award, number of key publications, organizational affiliation, receipt of prizes/honors, and gender.
dc.identifier.citationDing, Y., & Cronin, B. (2011). Popular and/or Prestigious? Measures of Scholarly Esteem, Information Processing and Management, 47(1), 80-96. (DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2010.01.002).
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/9970
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInformation Processing and Management
dc.rightsThis work may be protected by copyright unless otherwise stated.en
dc.subjectesteem
dc.subjectprestige
dc.subjectpopularity
dc.subjectinformation retrieval
dc.subjectcitation analysis
dc.titlePopular and/or Prestigious? Measures of Scholarly Esteem
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IPM-preprint2010.pdf
Size:
476.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us