Does Aggression Deter or Invite Reciprocal Behavior? Considering Coercive Capacity

No Thumbnail Available
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.

Date

2017-12

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Sage

Abstract

How do people respond to aggression? Theory differs on whether aggressive behavior deters antagonists or provokes retaliation, and the empirical evidence is mixed. We bridge contradictory findings in the literature by identifying a previously unexamined moderating variable: the extent to which individuals can increase their coercive capability (which we call “escalating”). We argue that when escalating is costly, aggression deters potential antagonists. In contrast, when escalating is less costly, behaving aggressively fails to deter aggressive partners. We test these predictions in two behavioral experiments that manipulate the cost of escalating and whether interaction partners are aggressive or deferential. We find support for deterrence predictions when escalating is either high or low cost, but not when it is medium cost. Taken together, we provide evidence that the cost of escalation plays a key role in decisions about aggression.

Description

This collection includes data, code, zTree files used to conduct the experiment, and the experimental protocol.

Keywords

experimental social psychology, social exchange, social dilemmas, prosocial behavior, power processes, intergroup conflict

Citation

Journal

DOI

Link(s) to data and video for this item

Relation

Rights

Type

Article

Collections