Does Aggression Deter or Invite Reciprocal Behavior? Considering Coercive Capacity

No Thumbnail Available
If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to iusw@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2017-12
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sage
Abstract
How do people respond to aggression? Theory differs on whether aggressive behavior deters antagonists or provokes retaliation, and the empirical evidence is mixed. We bridge contradictory findings in the literature by identifying a previously unexamined moderating variable: the extent to which individuals can increase their coercive capability (which we call “escalating”). We argue that when escalating is costly, aggression deters potential antagonists. In contrast, when escalating is less costly, behaving aggressively fails to deter aggressive partners. We test these predictions in two behavioral experiments that manipulate the cost of escalating and whether interaction partners are aggressive or deferential. We find support for deterrence predictions when escalating is either high or low cost, but not when it is medium cost. Taken together, we provide evidence that the cost of escalation plays a key role in decisions about aggression.
Description
This collection includes data, code, zTree files used to conduct the experiment, and the experimental protocol.
Keywords
experimental social psychology, social exchange, social dilemmas, prosocial behavior, power processes, intergroup conflict
Citation
DOI
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Relation
Rights
Type
Article
Collections