Communication strategies: persuasion and politeness in Akan judicial discourse.

dc.contributor.authorObeng, Samuel Gyasi
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-28T14:03:57Z
dc.date.available2008-07-28T14:03:57Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.description.abstractPersuasive Akan judicial discourse includes a variety of effective strategies, among them the use of apologetic expressions or mitigators, deferential modes of reference, indirectly authored speech forms (e.g., tales, riddles, proverbs, etc. ), negotiation, complements, and acknowledgement of impositions. These persuasive strategies help legal professionals in dealing with the face-wants that arise in the judicial process. In this article, I demonstrate how Akan legal professionals, in persuading a chief and his elders to do what they will otherwise not do - pardon an appellant - employ one or more of these strategies to achieve their ends.
dc.format.extent3762623 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationObeng, Samuel Gyasi. Communication strategies: persuasion and politeness in Akan judicial discourse. Text 17, no.1 (1997): 25-51.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/3157
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMouton de Gruyter
dc.rightsThis material is the copyright of Mouton de Gruyter. Please contact the publisher for information about reuse and reproduction.
dc.rights.urihttp://www.degruyter.com
dc.subjectGhana
dc.subjectWest Africa
dc.subjectdiscourse analysis
dc.subjectjudicial process
dc.titleCommunication strategies: persuasion and politeness in Akan judicial discourse.
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Communication.pdf
Size:
3.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us