A Case Study of Case Studies: Scientific Realism and Integrated HPS
Loading...
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Date
2014
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Permanent Link
Abstract
Case studies of science concerning the interpretation of specific theories and the nature of theory change over time are often presented as evidence for or against forms of selective realism: versions of scientific realism that advocate belief in connection with certain components of theories as opposed to their content as a whole. I consider the question of how probative case studies can be in this sphere, focusing on two prominent examples of selectivity: explanationist realism, which identifies realist commitment with components of theories that are putatively required to explain their empirical success; and entity realism, which identifies realist commitment with certain putatively causally efficacious entities. I argue that while case studies are essential to debates about these positions, they are not compelling in the way that their intended use suggests. Regarding explanationism, concerns about the “neutrality” of historical evidence are ultimately indefeasible. Regarding entity realism, arguments for and against naturally dissolve into disputes about the reference of theoretical terms which are insulated from the details of cases. I conclude by suggesting that the morals of this discussion extend to other forms of selective realism, namely structural realism and semirealism.
Description
Keywords
modern, contemporary, case study, realism, general science, historical case studies and selective realism
Citation
Journal
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Downstream publication: Chakravartty, Anjan. (2017) "Case Studies, Selective Realism, and Historical Evidence." EPSA15 Selected Papers, 13-23.