Regime Switching, Learning, and the Great Moderation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.

Date

2008-04-30

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research

Abstract

This paper examines the "bad luck" explanation for changing volatility in U.S. inflation and output when agents do not have rational expectations, but instead form expectations through least squares learning with an endogenously changing learning gain. It has been suggested that this type of endogenously changing learning mechanism can create periods of excess volatility without the need for changes in the variance of the underlying shocks. Bad luck is modeled into a standard New Keynesian model by augmenting it with two states that evolve according to a Markov chain, where one state is characterized by large variances for structural shocks, and the other state has relatively smaller variances. To assess whether learning can explain the Great Moderation, the New Keynesian model with volatility regime switching and dynamic gain learning is estimated by maximum likelihood. The results show that learning does lead to lower variances for the shocks in the volatile regime, but changes in regime is still significant in differences in volatility from the 1970s and after the 1980s.

Description

Keywords

CAEPR, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Learning, regime switching, great moderation, New Keynesian model, maximum likelihood, Monetary Economics

Citation

Journal

DOI

Link(s) to data and video for this item

This paper is also available on SSRN and RePEc.

Relation

Rights

Type

Working Paper