From Expressive Language to Mythemes: Meaning in Mythic Narratives
Loading...
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Date
2002
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Indiana University Press
Permanent Link
Abstract
It is no secret that there are many ways of thinking about myth, or that
myths have multiple layers and levels of meanmg. These certainties provoke
a number of uncertainties when we attempt to define myth or interpret
its meaning. In this essay I will have relatively little to say about the
problem of defining myth, but will rather occupy myself which interpretive
strategies rooted in the study of language. If we can agree that myth can or
must be a story, and that stories are necessarily composed of narrative discourse,
then we are well on the way toward recognizing the importance of
language as one parameter for assessing the meaning of myth. But our
quest will deliver us into some curious paradoxes, when we learn that scholarly
programs originating in the study of language can arrive at very different
places, and that the very notion of story may be deleted altogether from
the enterprise.
Description
Keywords
Citation
McDowell, John H. “From Expressive Language to Mythemes: Meaning in Mythic Narratives.” (2002) In Myth, A New Symposium. William Hansen and Gregory Schrempp (ed.). Indiana University Press, pp. 29-45.
Journal
DOI
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Relation
Rights
Type
Book chapter