Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education: How strong is the link?

Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.



Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title


The Journal of Higher Education


Academic selectivity plays a dominant role in the public's understanding of what constitutes institutional excellence or quality in undergraduate education. In this study, we analyzed two independent data sets to estimate the net effect of three measures of college selectivity on dimensions of documented good practices in undergraduate education. With statistical controls in place for important confounding influences, an institution's median student SAT/ACT score, a nearly identical proxy for that score, and the Barron's Selectivity Score explained from less than 0.1% to 20% of the between-institution variance and from less than 0.1% to 2.7% of the total variance in good practices. The implications of these findings for what constitutes quality in undergraduate education, college choice decisions, and the validity of national college rankings are discussed.




Ernest T. Pascarella, Ty Cruce, Paul D. Umbach, Gregory C. Wolniak, George D. Kuh, Robert M. Carini, John C. Hayek, Robert M. Gonyea & Chun-Mei Zhao (2006) Institutional Selectivity and Good Practices in Undergraduate Education: How Strong is the Link?, The Journal of Higher Education, 77:2, 251-285, DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2006.11778926


Link(s) to data and video for this item