Building a Publishing Platform Crosswalk: A Documentation Month Case Study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.

Date

2023-05-09

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

[Bloomington, Ind.] : Indiana University

Abstract

One of the challenges library publishers face is, with so many new academy-owned publishing platforms available, which one is right for their services or their author needs? We identified several common publishing/digital scholarship platforms — Fulcrum, Manifold, Scalar, OJS, Janeway, and a few others — and researched basic documentation on each of them across a specific set of user-needs criteria. Criteria included publication and content types, what’s possible to ingest or embed, hosting services, preservation and export options, and a few others. We also identified, when possible, what makes one platform stand out from another when they fell into similar publishing realms (i.e., books vs. journals vs. collections). Our presentation covers which platforms we chose, what documentation we looked for for each and why, and how we decided to design the final crosswalk. It also highlights how much we were able to accomplish with one hour a week during LPC’s documentation month.

Description

Keywords

Publishing Platforms, Crosswalk, Comparisons, Features, Library Publishing

Citation

Guimont, C., Ball, C., Vaughn, M. (2023, May 8–11). Building a Publishing Platform Crosswalk: A Documentation Month Case Study. [Online conference presentation] Library Publishing Forum, Virtual.

Journal

Link(s) to data and video for this item

Relation

Rights

Type

Presentation