When is retaliation respected? Status and vengefulness in intergroup and interpersonal contexts

No Thumbnail Available
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.

Date

2020

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Sage

Abstract

We investigate how conflict between groups shapes social status within groups. Conflict may create opportunities for individuals to gain or lose status by demonstrating group commitment. Pursuing revenge for an intergroup affront can serve as a source of status in settings characterized by a “culture of honor” or “code of the street”. Yet, we know little about whether this holds in everyday settings. We develop a theoretical account of the relationship between vengeful behavior and social status. We test our predictions with four online survey experiments. Respondents generally perceive intergroup retaliation as more status-worthy than interpersonal retaliation, these status rewards are similar for men and women, are specific to retaliation rather than initiating aggression, and are diminished by premeditation. Broader implications include understanding how status shapes the social organization of aggression, why trivial disputes escalate, and the link between inter- and intra-group relations.

Description

Keywords

This includes data, STATA do-files, survey text, and survey files (Qualtrics .qsf) for Benard and Doan's "When is retaliation respected? Status and vengefulness in intergroup and interpersonal contexts", published in Socius.

Citation

Journal

DOI

Link(s) to data and video for this item

Relation

Rights

CC BY-NC

Type

Dataset
Other

Collections