The Pleasures and Challenges of Collaborative Qualitative Research

dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-11T17:58:24Z
dc.date.available2017-01-11T17:58:24Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-09
dc.descriptionElizabeth A. Armstrong is a sociologist with research interests in the areas of sexuality, gender, culture, organizations, social movements, and higher education. Professor Armstrong joined the Department of Sociology and the Organizational Studies Program at the University of Michigan in 2009. Before that, she held a faculty appointment in the Department of Sociology at Indiana University. She was a fellow at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University and a recipient of a National Academy of Education/Spencer Postdoctoral Fellowship. She earned her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in Sociology at the University of California-Berkeley and a B.A. in Sociology and Computer Science from the University of Michigan.en
dc.description.abstractContemporary qualitative research often involves teams of researchers collaborating on a project. Armstrong will discuss the pleasures and challenges of this style of research, drawing both on her experiences working with Indiana University sociology alum Laura Hamilton and a team of graduate and undergraduate researchers on Paying for the Party and her more recent experiences at the University of Michigan. Larger teams can collect more data and leverage the diverse social identities of researchers to gain entree to research sites and participants. Collaboration can also add rigor to data analysis, as classifications and interpretations are debated by the research team. However, collaboration introduces challenges of coordination at all stages of the process. These challenges grow with the size of the research team. In addition, the temptation to collect large volumes of data creates risks that the principal investigator may fall into the role of administrator rather than fieldworker and may lose touch with the data. Goffman argued for full immersion in the field and saw the ethnographer's embodied reactions as invaluable. This embodied knowledge can not easily inform the final product if the person who participated in the ethnographic or interview interactions is not the one doing the writing.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/21177
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherIndiana University Workshop in Methodsen
dc.relation.urihttp://purl.dlib.indiana.edu/iudl/media/029p097b9x
dc.subjectWorkshop in Methodsen
dc.subjectethnographyen
dc.titleThe Pleasures and Challenges of Collaborative Qualitative Researchen
dc.typePresentationen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016-12-09_wim_armstrong_qualitative_flyer.pdf
Size:
349.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Event flyer
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.