Trade Liberalization, Heterogeneous Firms and the Soft Budget Constraint

dc.contributor.authorJang, Yong Joon
dc.contributor.authorAlexeev, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-02T16:56:32Z
dc.date.available2012-04-02T16:56:32Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractWe analyze the interaction between the soft budget constraint (SBC) and international trade by placing Segal’s (1998) SBC model within Melitz’s (2003) framework of international trade with heterogeneous monopolistically competitive firms. As in Segal’s model, SBC may result in moral hazard. The opening to international trade adds another sort of inefficiency. Some firms that would have become exporters in the absence of SBC choose to apply low effort and not export in order to extract a subsidy from the government. This effect takes place when the trade costs are sufficiently low. Overall, however, trade liberalization reduces inefficiencies generated by SBC. The number of firms subject to moral hazard SBC decreases, aggregate effort level increases and aggregate profits lost due to SBC-induced sub-optimal effort decline as trade costs decrease.
dc.identifier.citationAlexeev, Michael V. and Yong Joon Jang. Trade liberalization, heterogeneous firms and the soft budget constraint. Journal of Comparative Economics 38 (2010) 449-460.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/14317
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2010.07.001
dc.rightsCopyright © 2010 Association for Comparative Economic Studies
dc.subjectmonopolistic competition
dc.subjectheterogeneous firms
dc.subjectinternational trade
dc.subjectSoft budget constraint
dc.titleTrade Liberalization, Heterogeneous Firms and the Soft Budget Constraint
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jce_trade_lib&sbc_paper_rev2.pdf
Size:
270.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections

Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us