A Secret Weapon?: Applying Privacy Doctrine to the Second Amendment
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us
Date
2019-05-01
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Permanent Link
Abstract
For the past 80 years privacy has been of increasingly important legal concern. In 1952, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Public Utilities Commission of the District of Columbia et al. v. Pollak et al. that plaintiffs had no legal right to avoid radio broadcasts in Washington, D.C. city trolleys and buses. The U.S. Supreme Court distinguished a bus, a public space, from a home, a private space, and ruled that the broadcasts were not inconsistent with public convenience, comfort, or safety because individuals in public are “subject to reasonable limitations in relation to the rights of others.” The lone dissenter, Justice William Douglas, urged, “Liberty . . . must mean more than freedom from unlawful governmental restraint; it must include privacy as well, if it is to be a repository of freedom. The right to be let alone is indeed the beginning of all freedom.”
Description
This record is for a(n) offprint of an article published in Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly on 2019-05-01.
Keywords
Citation
Madeira, Jody Lynee. "A Secret Weapon?: Applying Privacy Doctrine to the Second Amendment." Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 555-570, 2019-05-01.
Journal
Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly