Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks
Loading...
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Date
2011-01
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Journal of Informetrics
Permanent Link
Abstract
Scientific collaboration and endorsement are well-established research topics which utilize three kinds of methods: survey/questionnaire, bibliometrics, and complex network analysis. This paper combines topic modeling and path-finding algorithms to determine whether productive authors tend to collaborate with or cite researchers with the same or different interests, and whether highly cited authors tend to collaborate with or cite each other. Taking information retrieval as a test field, the results show that productive authors tend to directly coauthor with and closely cite colleagues sharing the same research interests; they do not generally collaborate directly with colleagues having different research topics, but instead directly or indirectly cite them; and highly cited authors do not generally coauthor with each other, but closely cite each other.
Description
Keywords
path-finding algorithm, topic modeling, scientific endorsement, Scientific collaboration
Citation
Journal
DOI
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Relation
Rights
Type
Article