When Is Retaliation Respected? Status and Vengefulness in Intergroup and Interpersonal Contexts
No Thumbnail Available
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us
Date
2020-11-04
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Permanent Link
Abstract
The authors investigate how conflict between groups shapes social status within groups. Conflict may create opportunities for individuals to gain or lose status by demonstrating group commitment. Pursuing revenge for an intergroup affront can serve as a source of status in settings characterized by a “culture of honor” or “code of the street.” Yet little is known about whether this holds in everyday settings. The authors develop a theoretical account of the relationship between vengeful behavior and social status. They test their predictions with four online survey experiments. Respondents generally perceive intergroup retaliation as more status-worthy than interpersonal retaliation, and these status rewards are similar for men and women, are specific to retaliation rather than initiating aggression, and are diminished by premeditation. Broader implications include understanding how status shapes the social organization of aggression, why trivial disputes escalate, and the link between inter- and intragroup relations.
Description
Keywords
OA Fund, group processes, status, conflict, revenge
Citation
Benard, Stephen, and Doan, Long. "When Is Retaliation Respected? Status and Vengefulness in Intergroup and Interpersonal Contexts." Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, vol. 6, 2020-11-04.
Journal
Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Relation
Rights
CC BY-NC