Mediating Ethnic Conflict at the Grassroots: the Role of Local Associational Life in Shaping Political Values in Cote d'Ivoire and Ghana.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.

Date

2004

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

Abstract

This article attempts to understand why ethnic-regional civil war has challenged the national unity of Côte d'Ivoire and not Ghana, two neighbouring countries with nearly identical ethnic, religious, and regional divisions, by examining politics at the grassroots. Based on a carefully controlled comparison of two similar regions of Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana, the study investigates how participation in local voluntary associations reinforces the local experience of the state to shape the ongoing development of political values and affect the prospects for ethnic peace and democracy. The article finds that participation in ethnically heterogenous voluntary associations does not necessarily promote democratic values and practice. In fact, in Côte d'Ivoire, participation in ethnically heterogeneous cocoa producer and mutual assistance organisations reinforces vertical patronage networks based on narrower ethnic identities. In contrast, in Ghana, participation in more ethnically homogeneous local church groups encourages the development of democratic values and practices at the local level that mediate the potential for ethnic conflict and support the consolidation of a democratic regime.

Description

This article has been deposited with the full permission of the publisher.

Keywords

ethnic conflict, West Africa, civil society, case studies

Citation

Morris MacLean, Lauren. Mediating Ethnic Conflict at the Grassroots: the Role of Local Associational Life in Shaping Political Values in Cote d'Ivoire and Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 42(4): 589-617.

Journal

DOI

Relation

Rights

Article is copyright of Cambridge University Press. Please contact the publisher at www.cambridge.org to use or reproduce this work.

Type

Article