False Modesty

dc.contributor.authorHarbaugh, Rick
dc.contributor.authorTo, Ted
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-20T15:58:28Z
dc.date.available2025-02-20T15:58:28Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractIs it always wise to disclose good news? We find that the weakest senders with good news have the most incentive to boast about it if the receiver has any private information. Hence the act of disclosing good news can paradoxically make the sender look bad. Withholding good news is an equilibrium if standards for the news are sufficiently weak or prior expectations without the news are sufficiently favorable. Full disclosure is the unique equilibrium when standards are sufficiently difficult, when standards are sufficiently fine, or when prior expectations are sufficiently unfavorable. Since the sender has a legitimate fear of looking too anxious to reveal good news, mandating that the sender disclose the news can help the sender. The model's predictions are consistent with when faculty avoid using titles such as "Dr" or "Professor" in voicemail greetings and course syllabi.
dc.identifier.citationHarbaugh, Rick, and To, Ted. "False Modesty." Journal of Economic Theory, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.777924.
dc.identifier.otherBRITE 2501
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/30941
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.777924
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=777924
dc.relation.journalJournal of Economic Theory
dc.titleFalse Modesty

Files

Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us