Relative importance of major job performance dimensions in determining supervisors' overall job performance ratings
dc.contributor.author | Choi, JaeYoung | |
dc.contributor.author | Miao, Chao | |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, In-Sue | |
dc.contributor.author | Berry, Christopher Michael | |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Kwanghyun | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-20T16:53:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-20T16:53:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-04-27 | |
dc.description | This record is for a(n) postprint of an article published in Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences on 2018-04-27; the version of record is available at https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1495. | |
dc.description.abstract | This study explores the factor structure of job performance and each performance dimension's relative importance in determining supervisors' overall job performance ratings. We found that the optimal factor structure of job performance includes five dimensions: task performance, organizational citizenship behaviour directed toward the organization and individuals (OCB‐O and OCB‐I, respectively), and counterproductive work behaviour directed toward the organization and individuals (CWB‐O and CWB‐I, respectively). The percent‐based relative weight (%RW) is the highest for task performance in determining job performance, followed by OCB and CWB. Interestingly, the %RW of non‐task performance dimensions directed toward the organization (OCB‐O and CWB‐O) is similar to the %RW of task performance but greater than the %RW of non‐task performance dimensions directed toward individuals (OCB‐I and CWB‐I). | |
dc.description.version | postprint | |
dc.identifier.citation | Choi, JaeYoung, et al. "Relative importance of major job performance dimensions in determining supervisors' overall job performance ratings." Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, vol. 36, pp. 377-389, 2018-04-27, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1495. | |
dc.identifier.other | BRITE 4531 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2022/32479 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.relation.isversionof | https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1495 | |
dc.relation.journal | Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences | |
dc.title | Relative importance of major job performance dimensions in determining supervisors' overall job performance ratings |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- 4531_Relative-importance-of-major-job-performance.pdf
- Size:
- 363.33 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
Collections
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us