Relative importance of major job performance dimensions in determining supervisors' overall job performance ratings

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

External File or Record

Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

This study explores the factor structure of job performance and each performance dimension's relative importance in determining supervisors' overall job performance ratings. We found that the optimal factor structure of job performance includes five dimensions: task performance, organizational citizenship behaviour directed toward the organization and individuals (OCB‐O and OCB‐I, respectively), and counterproductive work behaviour directed toward the organization and individuals (CWB‐O and CWB‐I, respectively). The percent‐based relative weight (%RW) is the highest for task performance in determining job performance, followed by OCB and CWB. Interestingly, the %RW of non‐task performance dimensions directed toward the organization (OCB‐O and CWB‐O) is similar to the %RW of task performance but greater than the %RW of non‐task performance dimensions directed toward individuals (OCB‐I and CWB‐I).

Series and Number:

EducationalLevel:

Is Based On:

Target Name:

Teaches:

Table of Contents

Description

This record is for a(n) postprint of an article published in Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences on 2018-04-27; the version of record is available at https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1495.

Keywords

Citation

Choi, JaeYoung, et al. "Relative importance of major job performance dimensions in determining supervisors' overall job performance ratings." Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, vol. 36, pp. 377-389, 2018-04-27, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1495.

Journal

Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences

DOI

Rights

This work may be protected by copyright unless otherwise stated.

Type