Efficacy of Command-and-Control and Market-Based Environmental Regulation in Developing Countries

Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us

Date

2017-11-15

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Like their counterparts in industrialized countries, environmental regulators in developing countries rely principally on two types of instruments: command-and-control (CAC) policies, such as emissions and technology standards, and to a lesser extent, market- based incentives (MBIs), such as emissions fees and tradable permits. But these regulators often lack the capacity to implement, monitor and enforce CAC and MBI policies. As a result, the efficacy of those policies is an empirical matter. We review emerging experimental and quasi-experimental evidence on CAC and MBI policies in developing countries, specifically, 32 studies of CAC policies and 9 studies of MBIs. Although drawn from a small and decidedly nonrandom sample of countries and policy types, the evidence clearly indicates that CAC and MBI policies can have significant environmental benefits in developing countries. In addition to cataloging and reviewing this evidence, we discuss data and methodological challenges to augmenting it and suggest directions for future research.

Description

This record is for a(n) preprint of an article published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Resource Economics on 2017-11-15; the version of record is available at https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023144.

Keywords

Citation

Blackman, Allen, et al. "Efficacy of Command-and-Control and Market-Based Environmental Regulation in Developing Countries." Annual Review of Resource Economics, vol. 10, pp. 381-404, 2017-11-15, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023144.

Journal

Annual Review of Resource Economics

DOI

Link(s) to data and video for this item

Relation

Rights

Type