Efficacy of Command-and-Control and Market-Based Environmental Regulation in Developing Countries
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us
Date
2017-11-15
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Permanent Link
Abstract
Like their counterparts in industrialized countries, environmental regulators in developing countries rely principally on two types of instruments: command-and-control (CAC) policies, such as emissions and technology standards, and to a lesser extent, market- based incentives (MBIs), such as emissions fees and tradable permits. But these regulators often lack the capacity to implement, monitor and enforce CAC and MBI policies. As a result, the efficacy of those policies is an empirical matter. We review emerging experimental and quasi-experimental evidence on CAC and MBI policies in developing countries, specifically, 32 studies of CAC policies and 9 studies of MBIs. Although drawn from a small and decidedly nonrandom sample of countries and policy types, the evidence clearly indicates that CAC and MBI policies can have significant environmental benefits in developing countries. In addition to cataloging and reviewing this evidence, we discuss data and methodological challenges to augmenting it and suggest directions for future research.
Description
This record is for a(n) preprint of an article published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Resource Economics on 2017-11-15; the version of record is available at https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023144.
Keywords
Citation
Blackman, Allen, et al. "Efficacy of Command-and-Control and Market-Based Environmental Regulation in Developing Countries." Annual Review of Resource Economics, vol. 10, pp. 381-404, 2017-11-15, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023144.
Journal
Annual Review of Resource Economics