IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG)

dc.contributor.authorHari, Riitta
dc.contributor.authorBaillet, Sylvain
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Gareth
dc.contributor.authorBurgess, Richard
dc.contributor.authorForss, Nina
dc.contributor.authorGross, Joachim
dc.contributor.authorHämäläinen, Matti
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Ole
dc.contributor.authorKakigi, Ryusuke
dc.contributor.authorMauguière, François
dc.contributor.authorNakasato, Nobukatzu
dc.contributor.authorPuce, Aina
dc.contributor.authorRomani, Gian-Luca
dc.contributor.authorSchnitzler, Alfons
dc.contributor.authorTaulu, Samu
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-04T21:18:14Z
dc.date.available2019-03-04T21:18:14Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.description.abstractMagnetoencephalography (MEG) records weak magnetic fields outside the human head and thereby provides millisecond-accurate information about neuronal currents supporting human brain function. MEG and electroencephalography (EEG) are closely related complementary methods and should be interpreted together whenever possible. This manuscript covers the basic physical and physiological principles of MEG and discusses the main aspects of state-of-the-art MEG data analysis. We provide guidelines for best practices of patient preparation, stimulus presentation, MEG data collection and analysis, as well as for MEG interpretation in routine clinical examinations. In 2017, about 200 whole-scalp MEG devices were in operation worldwide, many of them located in clinical environments. Yet, the established clinical indications for MEG examinations remain few, mainly restricted to the diagnostics of epilepsy and to preoperative functional evaluation of neurosurgical patients. We are confident that the extensive ongoing basic MEG research indicates potential for the evaluation of neurological and psychiatric syndromes, developmental disorders, and the integrity of cortical brain networks after stroke. Basic and clinical research is, thus, paving way for new clinical applications to be identified by an increasing number of practitioners of MEG.
dc.identifier.citationHari R, Baillet S, Barnes G, Burgess R, Forss N, Gross J, Hämäläinen M, Jensen O, Kakigi R, Mauguière F, Nakasato N, Puce A, Romani G, Schnitzler A, Taulu S. (2018) Practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG): Report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 129: 1720-1747. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.03.042.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.03.042
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/22786
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherClinical Neurophysiology
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245718306576?via%3Dihub
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectMagnetoencephalography
dc.subjectElectroencephalography
dc.subjectClinical neurophysiology
dc.subjectEvoked and event-related responses
dc.subjectTransient and steady-state responses
dc.subjectSpontaneous brain activity
dc.subjectNeural oscillations
dc.subjectAnalysis and interpretation
dc.subjectArtifacts
dc.subjectSource modeling
dc.subjectEpilepsy
dc.subjectPreoperative evaluation
dc.subjectStroke
dc.subjectPain
dc.subjectTraumatic brain injury
dc.subjectParkinson’s disease
dc.subjectHepatic encephalopathy
dc.subjectAlzheimer’s disease and dementia
dc.subjectNeuropsychiatric disorders
dc.subjectBrain maturation and development
dc.subjectDyslexia
dc.subjectGuidelines
dc.titleIFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG)
dc.typeArticle

Files

Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us