Critical Review of Ethnographic Reports

Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.

Date

2009-01-08

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Unpublished

Abstract

In this paper, I compare and contrast the approaches of three ethnographers to give some idea of the range of possible reporting styles one can find. The texts I analyzed are The Man in the Principal’s Office, by Harry F. Wolcott, Street Corner Society, by William Foote Whyte, and The Color of Strangers, the Color of Friends, by Alan Peshkin. I compared five aspects of these three ethnographic reports, which I explained in detail as I discussed them: (1) the texture of description, (2) the roles and activities of the researcher, (3) the adequacy of evidence reported, (4) the texture of authorial voice in the report, and (5) the social theory perspective of the author. I covered each point independently, discussing all three texts together under each point.

Description

This is an unpublished paper.

Keywords

critical review, ethnographic reports, texture of description, adequacy of evidence, texture of authorial voice, social theory

Citation

Coronel-Molina, S. (2009). Critical Review of Ethnographic Reports. Unpublished manuscript.

Journal

DOI

Link(s) to data and video for this item

Relation

Rights

Type

Article