Critical Review of Ethnographic Reports
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Date
2009-01-08
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Unpublished
Permanent Link
Abstract
In this paper, I compare and contrast the approaches of three ethnographers to give some idea of the range of possible reporting styles one can find. The texts I analyzed are The Man in the Principal’s Office, by Harry F. Wolcott, Street Corner Society, by William Foote Whyte, and The Color of Strangers, the Color of Friends, by Alan Peshkin. I compared five aspects of these three ethnographic reports, which I explained in detail as I discussed them: (1) the texture of description, (2) the roles and activities of the researcher, (3) the adequacy of evidence reported, (4) the texture of authorial voice in the report, and (5) the social theory perspective of the author. I covered each point independently, discussing all three texts together under each point.
Description
This is an unpublished paper.
Keywords
critical review, ethnographic reports, texture of description, adequacy of evidence, texture of authorial voice, social theory
Citation
Coronel-Molina, S. (2009). Critical Review of Ethnographic Reports. Unpublished manuscript.
Journal
DOI
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Relation
Rights
Type
Article