Are ideophones really as weird and extra-systematic as linguists make them out to be?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorNewman, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-26T15:59:03Z
dc.date.available2017-05-26T15:59:03Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citationNewman, Paul. 2001. Are ideophones really as weird and extra-systematic as linguists make them out to be?, in Ideophones, ed. by F.K.E. Voeltz and C. Killian-Hatz, pp. 251-58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/21471
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Benjamins
dc.rightsExcept where otherwise noted, this content is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license includes the following terms: You are free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Under the following terms: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectHausa
dc.subjectAfrican Languages
dc.subjectLinguistics
dc.subjectIdeophones
dc.titleAre ideophones really as weird and extra-systematic as linguists make them out to be?
dc.typeBook chapter

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IdeophonesWeirdExtraSystematic.pdf
Size:
20.42 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

Paul Newman Papers
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us