Demographic Uncertainty and Welfare in a Life-cycle Model under Alternative Public Pension Systems

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.

Date

2008-09-19

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research

Abstract

In this paper, I analyze consumption, aggregate savings, output and welfare implications of five different social security arrangements whenever there is demographic uncertainty. Following Bohn (2002), I analyze the effect of an uncertain population growth in an extended version of a modified Life-cycle model developed by Gertler (1999). Population growth dampens savings and output under all arrangements. Pay-as-you-go-Defined Benefit system appears to fare better than all other alternatives, falling short of the private annuity market with no pension system. But social security in general increases social welfare, with Fully Funded systems faring the best. Thus there appears to be a clear trade-off between growth and social welfare. The social security system also reduces the volatility of the economy.

Description

Keywords

CAEPR, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Demographic uncertainty, Social welfare, Life-cycle model, Annuity market, Pay-as-you-go, Fully funded, Defined benefit, Defined contribution, alternative social security arrangements

Citation

Journal

DOI

Link(s) to data and video for this item

This paper is also available on SSRN and RePEc.

Relation

Rights

Type

Working Paper