Recognizing competencies vs. completion vs. participation: Ideal roles for web-enabled digital badges
No Thumbnail Available
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Permanent Link
Abstract
Open digital badges are new credentials that can contain specific claims and links to web-enabled evidence, and can then circulate in networks. Badges are helping facilitate broader shifts away from measuring, accrediting, and credentialing achievement and towards capturing, validating, and recognizing learning. A study of 30 funded efforts to develop badges found that none of the efforts to develop competency badges (for demonstrating specific competencies) resulted in thriving badge-based ecosystems, while four of the five efforts to develop participation badges (for engaged participation in social learning) resulted in thriving ecosystems. The findings were relatively mixed for the remaining efforts to develop completion badges (for individuals completing projects or investigations) and hybrid badges (for multiple types of learning). These findings suggest that innovators temper their ambition for capturing and recognizing evidence of individual competencies, and consider exploring more social assessments and informal and crowdsourced recognition.
Description
Keywords
interactive learning environments; lifelong learning; architecture for educational technology systems
Citation
Hickey, D. T., & Chartrand, G. T. (2020). Recognizing competencies vs. completion vs. participation: Ideal roles for web-enabled digital badges. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 943-956.
Journal
DOI
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Relation
Rights
Type
Article